smssia0112
Chairman of Selectors
- Joined
- Jul 15, 2005
It is a matter of opinion. There is no right or wrong answer, for example in Australia we only use RFM to describe what's between RF and RM. I suspect that at one stage, only one of them was used, and then the other was used instead in a different league/country, and that eventually it got twisted until they meant different things. In Australia, they still don't mean different things, there is only RM, RFM and RF.
In the ICC series however, RMF is definitely faster than RFM. It goes RM, RFM, RMF, RF (slowest to fastest).
In the ICC series however, RMF is definitely faster than RFM. It goes RM, RFM, RMF, RF (slowest to fastest).