dion
School Cricketer
I got him at the start of the third season, Becuase I was england coach I used Munday instead and he must have lost his central contract.Notts til i die said:Dion wot year are you in cos i would like to have Monty
I got him at the start of the third season, Becuase I was england coach I used Munday instead and he must have lost his central contract.Notts til i die said:Dion wot year are you in cos i would like to have Monty
Exactly YET I am talking about in three years time, who knows what he will do in that time. When was the last time a spinner got 5 wickets against Australia in a test on his ashes debute?hassan said:So what he got 5 wickets against the Aussies once .. doesnt make him all class bowler yet
I corrected my self lol. And the only reason Monty doesn't have variation is becuase Fletcher and Vaughn keep trying to tell him how to bowl, if the now guy is up to the job you should see Monty becuase a potent part of England attack.Griffo said:He wasnt on debut... he played in england before hand and i dont rate monty at all to be a good spinner in modern day cricket you need variation warne has it muri has it its what sets apart the good spinners and the great ones
But taking that average from 3 tests against a rampant team on pitches that didn't do anything for spinenrs unless your name was S.WARNE is not a fair way to judge averages.Griffo said:Panesar will get better without Fletcher no doubt but he was never that outstanding in the first place also he only was influenced by Fletcher in ODI's not Tests and averaging 37 against Australia is not world class
exactly Warny was true class from his first ball in the Ashes so just proves that Panesar doesnt have the qualitydion said:But taking that average from 3 tests against a rampant team on pitches that didn't do anything for spinenrs unless your name was S.WARNE is not a fair way to judge averages.
Your whole argument is rubbish, there have been plenty of bowlers well off warnes class that have first class 10 wicket hauls, just because someone doesn't have 700 test wickets doesn't mean they can't get lucky one day. It happens, and you totaly missed the point of the previous post, taking a test average from 3 games against a rampant Aussie side is not the best way to do things. You can't possibly know that in 4 years time Monty will not have taken a 10 wicket haul in first class cricket, im not saying he could do it in tests, but to say a game is 'unrealistic' becuase of a one off incident that is not beyond the realms of possibility and has happened to lesser bowlers than Monty. Anil Kumble has a test 10 wicket haul, yet the best Murali and Warne can manage is 9 and 8 respectivly. Does this mean that Kumble was a better bowler than them? The most wickets in an innings is very little indicator of a bolwers skill, and this is even more true in first class, were batsmen are of a lower quality and a decent bowler with a bit of look can take lots of wickets.hassan said:exactly Warny was true class from his first ball in the Ashes so just proves that Panesar doesnt have the quality