18.03.09: Vatican Victors @ Beijing Blitzers

[Kshitiz_Indian]

We're making it a big issue? Come on, open the eyes and see on a broader perspective.

Stubborn? We're stubborn? Bloody hell there are a lot of things happening in Cricsim, which are not proper, if we go about doing rematches for everyone then the league would probably take forever!

 

[shalin_hitter]

Some one please bring an interpreter for all the people in PCPL:@
WHy arent you ready to listen what AAmir is trying to say.And by the way there arent so MANY issues going on in cricsim.We are just saying that since these bugs occur occasionally and NOT every time why not just re sim the match for a fair decision though we do understand that you have a life out of PC but come on.Just 5 minutes wont hurt

 

[Kshitiz_Indian]

So you want the entire match to be resimmed just because of the fact that you didn't do your homework and didn't conclude from those "many matches" you simmed that you need atleast 6 bowlers? I'll tell you what, I did from around 10 matches and it doesn't take being a genius.

Kshitiz_Indian added 9 Minutes and 43 Seconds later...

And you want to know why won't 5 bowlers bowl 25 overs, 5 overs each?

Its because of repetition. A situation arises where 1 bowler has one over left, but every other bowler has finished theirs and this very bowler also bowled the 24'th over - and which is why he can't bowl the 25'th over - that's when the batsmen come into play to bowl due to no other options, and which is why we include atleast 6 bowlers. My advice, take the above into consideration into the next few matches or you'll find yourself in similar positions everytime.

 

[shalin_hitter]

It is just useless speaking here.Fine we accept defeat not that we denied it.
Let things go around like this forever and ever untill PC's sim come out.Fine?
But that dint happen the previous match against Sydney.

 

[Pranav]

If it is a temporary or rarely occuring problem then why not resim it? It hardly takes 5 mins to do that and if anyone dont has 5 mins then I can do that.

This question has been answered by me in the previous post.

Batsmen nowadays score more runs individually becuase of the feilding restrictions and free hit rule. Don't you think its unfair with the batsmen of the past because they didn't had this facility? My point is to say that if we can eliminate these factors then why not take the initiative?

Everything new that is impimented takes large time of dicussion and first it is adopted for few matches and then further decision is made wether to adopt it or not. You gotta understand that this bug will take time to fix and will be probably delt with before the next season.

And its your team who is making it a bigger issue not ours.

Our team members have just posted twice. The first being treva and the second being me. I think you need to get your calculations right :

 

[Kshitiz_Indian]

It is just useless speaking here.Fine we accept defeat not that we denied it.
Let things go around like this forever and ever untill PC's sim come out.Fine?
But that dint happen the previous match against Sydney.

OMG, do some research please. It didn't happen in your match against Sydney because the last guy who was bowling his 3'rd over didn't finish his over. He was at 2.3 overs.

Had he finished that over AGAIN atleast one batsman would've bowled, because there was no one else. Its a flaw in your lineup, nothing else.

 

[shalin_hitter]

Ok whatever.We will learn from our mistake.

 

[Kshitiz_Indian]

Thanks for understanding mate, now moving on. Wish you best of luck for the rest of the series!

 

[treva]

My dear friend thats what Suren said about it. If it is a temporary or rarely occuring problem then why not resim it?

If we re-simmed a game everytime it happened then we'd take forever getting matches played. It will only happen again even if we did re-sim. Face it, it's not get re-simmed. Move on and stop moaning about the past, it'll get you nowhere...

 

[ansariaamir_leo]

So you want the entire match to be resimmed just because of the fact that you didn't do your homework and didn't conclude from those "many matches" you simmed that you need atleast 6 bowlers? I'll tell you what, I did from around 10 matches and it doesn't take being a genius.

Kshitiz_Indian added 9 Minutes and 43 Seconds later...

And you want to know why won't 5 bowlers bowl 25 overs, 5 overs each?

Its because of repetition. A situation arises where 1 bowler has one over left, but every other bowler has finished theirs and this very bowler also bowled the 24'th over - and which is why he can't bowl the 25'th over - that's when the batsmen come into play to bowl due to no other options, and which is why we include atleast 6 bowlers. My advice, take the above into consideration into the next few matches or you'll find yourself in similar positions everytime.

I understand that situation and even Suren said 1 over is acceptable but here we had 2 which was out of the blue.

@ treva : I understood now. No matter what we do you guys have it in the back of your mind that we are stubborn why would we let it happen. We won by chance so lets keep hold of the victory. So its fine, no need for re-simming

@ PP : I know it takes time to fix the bug, its not as easy as simming the game. And thats why we suggested to re-sim the match because the bug cannot be fixed right now.

Lets end it here. The bottom line is, people want things to go as it is, may it be right or wrong, they want it to keep it same just because they want it to be as it is and wouldn't listen to other people.

 

[Simbazz]

Ok guys, lets just cool it

The game will not be resimmed. If it was the fault of one of the PCPL employees then yes, there is a likelihood that it would be simmed again.

This is the simulation's "bug," therefore we couldn't stop it.

It is a massively unfortunate incident, which as people have said, regularly happens which is totally stupid.

As Colin said also, all we can do is encourage Sohum and his merry men to get the PC simulator built

Again, the PCPL apologise for this, but we cannot re-sim every time this happens.

 

[bladescape]

WOW!
I was annoyed at the simulator for this,and annoyed at Shantanu for suggesting that Yuvraj had an average of 99,But man!
This arguement just exploded,I'm going to agree with Suren here,VV is not to blame and neither is anyone else,except the sim.
So how is this for a conclusion:
We sue Cricsim!!!

 

[Kshitiz_Indian]

Ok guys, lets just cool it

The game will not be resimmed. If it was the fault of one of the PCPL employees then yes, there is a likelihood that it would be simmed again.

This is the simulation's "bug," therefore we couldn't stop it.

It is a massively unfortunate incident, which as people have said, regularly happens which is totally stupid.

As Colin said also, all we can do is encourage Sohum and his merry men to get the PC simulator built

Again, the PCPL apologise for this, but we cannot re-sim every time this happens.

Hey its always been all cool, anyways it isn't exactly a bug, more like lack of bowlers at a stage. 5 bowlers = 25 although makes 25 overs the order matters.

 

[Big Man]

Top win.

Happy with that hit out.

 

[WORLD CHAMPIONS]

Top win.

Happy with that hit out.

Yeh.... but we have to continue this becasue next time when they will face us their 1st priority will be revenge so we have to make sure we blow their objectives