P
pcfan123
Guest
I remember in EA07 if you chose backfoot to a ball that was too full it would pass under the bat and bowl you.
I remember in EA07 if you chose backfoot to a ball that was too full it would pass under the bat and bowl you.
Is there one post with all the videos released so far in it? That would be a good stickie
I agree with you. One thing which I really don't like about AC09 is how you can choose the wrong footwork and are only penalised with the 'WRONG FOOTWORK' message in the extreme cases - like trying to back-foot drive a yorker.
It really should work so that the more wrong you get it, the smaller your timing window gets, until it becomes so ludicrously small that you don't stand a chance of hitting it. It is possible to go back to a half-volley, but to not edge it requires a lot better timing (I can't think why that would be logically, but that's how it feels to me).
Having this would give the batsman a few more creative options, but with a risk attached. So you're facing a spinner who is bowling a really good length, and you can't get past the fielders at cover-thru-mid-wicket, so you might want to try and play a late cut. Playing a late cut to a full-ish ball requires really tight timing, and you are running a risk of an edge/missing it because it's not the ideal shot for the length of the ball, but you need to take the risk to relieve a bit of pressure.
Did the last game have the upper drive for 6 to third man against spinners that went 15 rows back? That was ridiculous on old games.
It would be great if they furthered Action Cam a bit into something really realistic - perhaps where you are watching it almost directly out of the batsman's eyes and there is no pitch marker for where the ball would land. Imagine trying to bat against that on a green pitch - quick bowlers swinging it different ways and you have no idea where it would land before hand. Now that would be a real test!
Still, I don't think I will end up buying this game as I didn't get AC09 either.. but I'll have to wait and see.
But not in the way he wants.The feature where you can't see the landing marker is already in the game!
I fail to see how no bowling marker will enhance gameplay. Let's assume for instance you are facing a fast bowler (Mitchell Johnson, Akhtar or Steyn). This means you will have to play a shot as soon as bowler lets go off the ball. If you wait to judge line and length of the delivery you will be way too late as per AC09 timing mechanism. So either you mistime most of the shots or you assume line and length of the delivery and play a pre-determined shot, which in no way improves gameplay experience.
Unless shot timing is modified in IC10, i.e. gives batsman enough time to judge line & length before playing a shot (most probably when the ball hits the pitch), bowling mark or HUD off will not be very useful IMO. I will be very interested to hear feedback about the feature from PC play-test team.
I think you are totally wrong because it actually makes you play the real game. This is how u cant hit a six or four every ball, as you have to judge the ball and play it little lately so u get singles and twos, and the wider ball is easily judged and hit for a four and the bouncer isnt easily judged so you duck it.
This is how i expect it to be in the game.