23 Feb - Kenya vs Pakistan
- Thread starter Gaurav_7
- Start date
Meet
Chairman of Selectors
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2009
- Location
- Bhavnagar, Gujarat
They broke their own 5th wicket stand record.Kenya were in trouble before this match even started :/
BKB1991
Panel of Selectors
Safe to say game is over. Boys get some bowling practice.
darthlewis1
Club Captain
Wow shahid afridi just bowled an 80 mph quicker ball.
WubbaLubbaDubDub
The Man With The Glip Glops
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2008
- Online Cricket Games Owned
- Don Bradman Cricket 14 - PS3
- Don Bradman Cricket 14 - Steam PC
- Don Bradman Cricket 14 - Xbox One
Nice game.. Good to see Pakistan behaved as a test playing nation unlike England who were out of soughts
Would be good to see them in quarter finals
Would be good to see them in quarter finals
Afridi Akhtar
Club Cricketer
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2010
- Online Cricket Games Owned
And BooM BooM takes 5 wicket haul!
ammar26
School Cricketer
Afridi strikes FIVE, really an awesome bowler
shravi
National Board President
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2005
- Profile Flag
- India
Not really. Just an average bowler against a mediocre team.
Afridi Akhtar
Club Cricketer
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2010
- Online Cricket Games Owned
ya ya. i just want to see IND VS PAK then you see whos better..lol he is even better more than better against strong teams..hope you got my point.No More Words..
I would say that sehwag is just an average batsmen infront of medicore team...Mate try to understand before posting something simply..
Last edited:
shravi
National Board President
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2005
- Profile Flag
- India
Okay, I will take that into due consideration.
Dare
Chairman of Selectors
shravi
National Board President
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2005
- Profile Flag
- India
Okay Afridi Akhtar, I am guessing that by "strong teams" you mean the test playing nations (in ODIs, of course). Here are Afridi's averages against the "strong teams".
Australia: 31
Bangladesh: 19
England: 23
India: 56
New Zealand: 48
South Africa: 39
Sri Lanka: 43
West Indies: 36
So he has a DECENT average against Australia and a very good average against England. I am ignoring Bangladesh because I do not consider them to be a strong team just yet although they have the potential to get there.
Compare this to Sehwag, who according to you, is an average batsman who only does well against mediocre teams. Lets see his batting averages vs all test playing nations (in ODIs).
Australia: 23
Bangladesh: 42
England: 37
New Zealand: 53
Pakistan: 36
South Africa: 27
Sri Lanka: 37
West Indies: 27
I will now color code. Green = excellent, blue = good, red = poor.
Afridi
Excellent: 2 (Bangladesh, England)
Good: 1 (Australia)
Poor: 5 (India, New Zealand, South Africa, Sri Lanka, West Indies)
Sehwag
Excellent: 2 (Bangladesh, New Zealand)
Good: 3 (England, Pakistan, Sri Lanka)
Poor: 3 (Australia, South Africa, West Indies)
I don't think I need to tell you that 3 (Bangladesh, England, Australia) is less than 5 (Bangladesh, New Zealand, England, Pakistan, Sri Lanka).
In short, because I know you're a little slow (just a little), Sehwag performs better against the "strong teams" than Afridi does.
If you want me to break it down further, I will just repeat what I said earlier. Afridi's five-for was just a an average bowler against a mediocre team. Hate to burst your bubble.
From your post it's obvious that you want to make what I said more than what it was by making it an India vs Pakistan issue. I see no logic or reason in that. The words "Sehwag" and "India" were not even included in my post yet you "coincidentally" decided to drag them in. Why? I think we all know the answer but I don't see a reason to spit it out.
Australia: 31
Bangladesh: 19
England: 23
India: 56
New Zealand: 48
South Africa: 39
Sri Lanka: 43
West Indies: 36
So he has a DECENT average against Australia and a very good average against England. I am ignoring Bangladesh because I do not consider them to be a strong team just yet although they have the potential to get there.
Compare this to Sehwag, who according to you, is an average batsman who only does well against mediocre teams. Lets see his batting averages vs all test playing nations (in ODIs).
Australia: 23
Bangladesh: 42
England: 37
New Zealand: 53
Pakistan: 36
South Africa: 27
Sri Lanka: 37
West Indies: 27
I will now color code. Green = excellent, blue = good, red = poor.
Afridi
Excellent: 2 (Bangladesh, England)
Good: 1 (Australia)
Poor: 5 (India, New Zealand, South Africa, Sri Lanka, West Indies)
Sehwag
Excellent: 2 (Bangladesh, New Zealand)
Good: 3 (England, Pakistan, Sri Lanka)
Poor: 3 (Australia, South Africa, West Indies)
I don't think I need to tell you that 3 (Bangladesh, England, Australia) is less than 5 (Bangladesh, New Zealand, England, Pakistan, Sri Lanka).
In short, because I know you're a little slow (just a little), Sehwag performs better against the "strong teams" than Afridi does.
If you want me to break it down further, I will just repeat what I said earlier. Afridi's five-for was just a an average bowler against a mediocre team. Hate to burst your bubble.
From your post it's obvious that you want to make what I said more than what it was by making it an India vs Pakistan issue. I see no logic or reason in that. The words "Sehwag" and "India" were not even included in my post yet you "coincidentally" decided to drag them in. Why? I think we all know the answer but I don't see a reason to spit it out.
Last edited:
Papa_Smurf
International Cricketer
Get ready to receive a positive rep from Yudi 
