The odds would be greater than 1/1, which means you will surely get more than the double. Isn't that enough!
Some of the one-sided events go like 10/1, 7/1, etc. which give out heaps of vCash.You want to stop the one-sided events by giving people more money for winning them???
I don't get it. How can you predict that odds will be greater than 1/1? Please explain what you mean...The odds would be greater than 1/1, which means you will surely get more than the double. Isn't that enough!
Some of the one-sided events go like 10/1, 7/1, etc. which give out heaps of vCash.
Reducing them to around 1/1 will be good.
But there's a reason why the odds are so high, because that outcome is very unlikely. The old risk and reward...Some of the one-sided events go like 10/1, 7/1, etc. which give out heaps of vCash.
Reducing them to around 1/1 will be good.
Stopping donations won't solve the problem either. If you just consider that as a problem, then the solution is to ask to donators from stop doing so!Donations are the problem, ATM people don't care, they're just betting, and if they lose it doesn't matter as they just go and beg for more, and can get like 50 million easily.
Some of the one-sided events go like 10/1, 7/1, etc. which give out heaps of vCash.
Leaving it as it is, is the best way.