puddleduck said:Yes they probably are, but that doesn't stop Harmison, Plunket/Mahmood or Hoggard being useful with the bat. Afterall just because Ponting is a better bat then Hussey, doesn't by any means make Hussey useless.
I think you probably picked the wrong word earlier when using "useless".
Regarding Englands batting depth, our tail is noticeably longer without Giles, but they still have the ability to eke out some runs, and with Panesar look more like taking wickets, so potentially are more dangerous, as it is wickets that win you test matches.
That all said, our actual batting depth in the top 6 now looks a lot stronger than it did before the Ashes, with some real competition for places emerging, and plenty of it from players under 26.
hussey > ponting
Ponting has had the chance, If Hussey debuted when he should of (when he was around 20
