blockerdave
ICC Chairman
Very fair comment. I think we also had a lot of inconsistency, in selection and performance.I've been thinking about this a lot recently when I've been doing my own 90s stuff.
England in the 90s had a lot of very good players and even a few excellent players. What all the other teams (apart from NZ and Zim) had however was 2, 3 or 4 all-time legendary players. Ambrose, Walsh, Lara, Wasim, Waqar, Warne, McGrath, Ponting, Waugh, Murali, de Silva, Sachin, Dravid, Donald, Kallis, Pollock.
England didn't have anyone at that 'freak' level and it was those players that were almost always the difference when they played.
I think as well - most of those teams had legendary bowlers, whereas the best players we had were batters. So if Atherton, Thorpe or Stewart didn’t fire we could be blown away - especially when you factor in Atherton’s back, Stewart’s constantly changing role etc. And even though we had some decent bowlers, we just never had anyone to compete with those sort of bowlers you’ve mentioned.