- Joined
- Sep 5, 2008
- Location
- England
- Profile Flag
- England
- Online Cricket Games Owned
- Don Bradman Cricket 14 - PS3
- Don Bradman Cricket 14 - Steam PC
- Don Bradman Cricket 14 - PS4
Sorry, I could've sworn the thread title said 'Brain friendly' challenges
Okay. Here goes nothing.....
A poor farmer went to the market to sell some peas and lentils. However, as he had only one sack and didn't want to mix peas and lentils, he poured in the peas first, tied the sack in the middle, and then filled the top portion of the sack with the lentils. At the market a rich innkeeper happened by with his own sack. He wanted to buy the peas, but he did not want the lentils.
Pouring the seed anywhere else but the sacks is considered soiling. Trading sacks is not allowed. The farmer can't cut a hole in his sack.
How would you transfer the peas to the innkeeper's sack, which he wants to keep, without soiling the produce?
Cause the thread title had a word named 'friendly' in it...Easy one I am afraid.
2nd FloorYou got off on the first or the second floor.
One morning I was on my way to the market and met a man who had 4 wives. Each of the wives had 4 bags, containing 4 dogs and each dog had 4 puppies. Taking all the things into consideration, how many were going to the market?
if we're considering only things that arrive at the market alive; then five people do since the dogs and puppies are probably crushed inside the bags
seriously; I have it at 341 things, and 325 living ones (which I originally guessed your question to mean for some reason; makes it more interesting anyway).
the living things answer is 1 + 4 + 16*4 + 4(16*4) = 1+4+64+256 = 325; you add on 16 to get a final total including the bags which gives you 341.
1 person was going to the market - You.One morning I was on my way to the market and met a man who had 4 wives. Each of the wives had 4 bags, containing 4 dogs and each dog had 4 puppies. Taking all the things into consideration, how many were going to the market?
There was a silent hint. The thing is for the second riddle, that it is just an arithmetic problem and not actually a riddle.You took the wrong way to solve it. Hence a wrong answer, people would get it once they start believing the world apart from the math.
people would get it once they start believing the world apart from the math.
I mean there exist a world which don't always requires math to solve problems. What I exactly mean, he should look out for the hidden clues and don't take it away with algebra.I'm not sure PC is ready for such a philosophical thread.