D
destroyersachin
Guest
Oh....I knew Indian army stands somewhere but had no idea about navy and the IAF. MIGs only fly in the air die, thats what the newspapers say.
You know what, empty vessels make more sound.Originally posted by destroyersachin@Feb 8 2004, 12:50 PM
Oh please, yea right ignorant....standing upto USA..India.....dream on...go fly a plane and die idiot...thats what the IAF is good for as we read in the newspapers
B) pl rememebr iniyan next time u fly ,drop a bomb over his head . :Originally posted by Iniyan+Feb 8 2004, 12:55 PM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Iniyan @ Feb 8 2004, 12:55 PM)</div><!--QuoteBegin-destroyersachinYou know what, empty vessels make more sound.@Feb 8 2004, 12:50 PM
Oh please, yea right ignorant....standing upto USA..India.....dream on...go fly a plane and die idiot...thats what the IAF is good for as we read in the newspapers
That's what I infer from you.
And, I am not afraid of death. If I were, I would have finished my engg. and gone to work for dollars. [/b]
These stats were true, Ricky, in 2003. They are as on Dec. 31, 2002.Originally posted by ricky123@Feb 8 2004, 12:53 PM
B) indian air force is ranked fourth in the world but indian navy is very very strong ,even better then china.
the pilots in the world r from japan ,they very well trained ,
japanese pilots r rated best in the world .
indian air force is strong but i dont think they can take on usa.
israel is better know for making weapons ,they have the best technology in the world ,they make weapons for usa ,
dont forget russia ,russia is also a very strong nation with very good airforce? and is rated 2nd in the world
You are semi-right ...Originally posted by andrew_nixon79+Feb 7 2004, 07:19 PM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(andrew_nixon79 @ Feb 7 2004, 07:19 PM)</div><!--QuoteBegin-ricky123Show me a link where they said they did it on purpose. I've not seen this anywhere. Every comment they've made on it they said it was an accident.@Feb 7 2004, 12:26 PM
B) it was not a accident ,first the said they had permission,then some people threaten to sue them ,then maybe they refused
But like I say... what's the problem? It's a breast. It's not as if they started having sex on the stage or anything. [/b]
B) i wont agree with u cuz she had a red star on her right nippleOriginally posted by nikhilverma+Feb 8 2004, 01:01 PM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(nikhilverma @ Feb 8 2004, 01:01 PM)</div>Originally posted by andrew_nixon79@Feb 7 2004, 07:19 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-ricky123You are semi-right ...@Feb 7 2004, 12:26 PM
B) it was not a accident ,first the said they had permission,then some people threaten to sue them ,then maybe they refused
Show me a link where they said they did it on purpose. I've not seen this anywhere. Every comment they've made on it they said it was an accident.
But like I say... what's the problem? It's a breast. It's not as if they started having sex on the stage or anything.
They planned to tear off the dress but a red cloth would hide her breast but accidently even the cloth came off..
They claimed it to be a wardrobe malfunction [/b]