Not so much of a bug this one. Just a gripe.
I know this has been mentioned 100 times already, but I was just browsing the Codemasters Forums and noticed a load of people whinging about the lack of a front/back foot shot option, and people telling me that Cricket 2005 was so much the better for having it.
I have talked about this point somewhere else on this forum, basically giving my reasons why having no option for front/back foot shots could be a good thing. But what I am about to say here is slightly different.
I'm really talking to the people who seem to adore the Cricket 2005 demo here.
This thought occured to me earlier when playing on the Cricket 2005 demo.
After about 60 overs or so on this game, and not once has a delivery been bowled where a back foot shot would have been more profitable than a front foot shot. I have tried playing back foot shots to the deliveries which are just short of an ideal length, but the batsman just plays over the top of the ball. I'm talking about playing simple shots like a run down to third man, or playing off the batsman's hip.
It seems that the back foot shot is obsolete once again - just like in Cricket 2004 where you could bowl a half-tracker over off stump, and the CPU would play a forward defensive shot to it.
That is therefore another reason why having the AI choose front/back foot for you could be better. It just has to be well implemented. I am yet to play the BLIC demo so I couldn't really say whether it has been or not.
Many thanks.