- Jan 6, 2021
I agree but with our feedback, they could get red of these minor issues, since most of these issues seem fixable.I am not going to go into every detail so much. Because no game is perfect!
Absolutely! But I would say it's only marginally better than C19 as of now. A Proper Judgement of this game would only be possible when we get "Proper" Gameplay.If you ask me, is it a complete overhaul as Ross said? Is it better than the previous iterations?
A BIG yes!
Good for you then! For me, I consider it a slight downgrade since the textures and objects don't seem very detailed and promising for a Next Gen Game and I felt that Cricket 19 did that better. These Graphics gives me more DBC 17 vibes than C19's. But I will say that the Lighting and Visuals are astounding! They did a Great Job in that department!Dont understand Why people say Are graphics downgrade , For me it looks great
The tree looks great.
I understand IGN is the biggest game site in Australia, but everytime BA go there, the video ends up being more a detriment to the casual viewer. Personally, I think the time could be spent on generating their own PR on their own. IGN doesn't have much traction these days anyway.Dear users who play on PC,
I'd strongly suggest to buy it on Steam. Give a play through with max graphics and custom difficulty (batting hard, bowling hardest in legendary mode) and then decide.
If you play less than 2 hours, you still can return and get refund if you think it's bad... But just don't fall for this IGN dump they took on us this morning..
I somehow feel the game will go down as best of all time cricket game.
Abso-freaking-lutely! As much as we hate Creepy Bajo.. I feel it would have been better overview video if he and Mike play it together..I understand IGN is the biggest game site in Australia, but everytime BA go there, the video ends up being more a detriment to the casual viewer. Personally, I think the time could be spent on generating their own PR on their own. IGN doesn't have much traction these days anyway.