Cricket Australia Upset With Bhajjis Remarks

Too bad all that money can't buy you lot some World Cups.

If you bothered to actually research, you'd know that the BCCI only overtook the ECB's revenues in 2006, which means that they are not nearly as rich as people think.
 
If you bothered to actually research, you'd know that the BCCI only overtook the ECB's revenues in 2006, which means that they are not nearly as rich as people think.

:eek: Thats shocking. But this wont happen in 2008. BCCI will be earning more than combined strength of other boards. ;)

Also Manee need new Avvy.
 
Sorry to interrupt but BCCI have funded highest after 1997 till today..
I don't have information about revenues..But ICC don't care about revenues of individual board...They need money..
 
If you bothered to actually research, you'd know that the BCCI only overtook the ECB's revenues in 2006, which means that they are not nearly as rich as people think.

This is the internet manee - since when do you have to do any kind of research on anything? Grow Up mate.
wink.gif


Thats shocking. But this wont happen in 2008. BCCI will be earning more than combined strength of other boards.

Now I wonder why that would be? :confused:
 
Innocent until proven guilty.Atleast that is what all law students learn.I am under the impression that a suspect in Australia is a criminal....Or maybe Aussie law is different.
Technically - Harbhajan's innoncent.
Logically - Harbhajan's guilty.

Admitting that we are wrong when we are not is a very stupid thing to do.
Also,i do not see even one Aussie player coming out in Haydos's support after that interview.
Same way no one who wasn't Indian backed up their team after incidents that have occured over the last few months? And we're supposed to be the most hated team in world cricket?
 
I would say that Harbhajan Singh is innocent technically, logically, and from essentially every aspect of this issue. I would be basing my opinion on what a Justice from the High Court of New Zealand concluded on the issue, but there are obviously more legally attuned members here, who would look to disagree with him. The most important point to note is that Symonds himself admitted that he wasn't sure of what Harbhajan said and that he could have uttered the words "teri maa ki", but once again, we probably have members here who were present on the pitch that day and heard Harbhajan say the word 'monkey' distinctly.
 
And we're supposed to be the most hated team in world cricket?

No one is saying that.A couple of incidents does not mean that you are the most hated team.I admit to liking a few players in your side and i respect them greatly-Brett Lee and Adam Gilchrist.
 
I would say that Harbhajan Singh is innocent technically, logically, and from essentially every aspect of this issue. I would be basing my opinion on what a Justice from the High Court of New Zealand concluded on the issue, but there are obviously more legally attuned members here, who would look to disagree with him. The most important point to note is that Symonds himself admitted that he wasn't sure of what Harbhajan said and that he could have uttered the words "teri maa ki", but once again, we probably have members here who were present on the pitch that day and heard Harbhajan say the word 'monkey' distinctly.
Yeah, Symonds admitted it could've been a possibility. Interview's with him after the court hearing were shown on the AB medal ceremonary and judging from what Symonds said there, he still quietly thinks that Harbhajan did call him a monkey and that the word "teri maa ki" was a bit far-fetched as it's something a lawyer was most likely to come up with. However, his decided to just let it rest.

He believes something seriously did happen and so did fellow Australian players who were at the court hearing and that he believes they were all made to look stupid because he was never going to be punished because of the BCCI threatening to boycott the tour if legal action was taken against Harbhajan.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top