In case sid is reading this, all answers must be given inthe thread, and not by PM.nightprowler10 said:only sid answered it by PMing me. :
He said he didn't do so because somebody told him he was spamming. I told him, answering a question isn't spamming, and that I won't tell him if he's right unless he posts in the thread. Anyhoo....andrew_nixon said:In case sid is reading this, all answers must be given inthe thread, and not by PM.
For all Tests (there aren't many where Aus didn't bowl twice)nightprowler10 said:Including the tests where Australia didn't play a second inning
So....is it 10?angryangy said:For all Tests (there aren't many where Aus didn't bowl twice)
???ZoraxDoom said:Hmm...
Wild guess...7?
That would be not batting.nightprowler10 said:Well, there is one instance when he DNB in a match where Australia bowled twice, is that what you are thinking of? In that case the answer would be 1 (the loneliest number).
Not 3 and it is a statistical rarity, because it is not common, even if it does happen to many bowlers.ZoraxDoom said:Thats not a statistical rarity, many bowlers might have not bowled in the second innings of a match.
3?
Oh duh!! :brickwallangryangy said:That would be not batting.
I was referring to Nightprowler when he said '1' as that isn't a rarity, and you are looking for one...angryangy said:That would be not batting.
Not 3 and it is a statistical rarity, because it is not common, even if it does happen to many bowlers.