age of the fall
International Cricketer
Nah, the stumps have to be in position, with the bails and all.
Are you sure about that? I'm pretty sure thats not right, although I could be wrong,
Nah, the stumps have to be in position, with the bails and all.
I don't think that's right. I believe the substitute does get credited for the catch.No, nobody gets credit for the catch.
Same for run-outs; they aren't officially recorded.
The striker is still subject to the laws, just as the runner is. He is stumped if he is out of his ground. A stumping would most likely take precedence in the event that both of them are outside their ground, but if the runner is outside his ground and the striker is not, then the striker is run out.Tell me if a batsman is having a runner and he is facing a spinner.If his runner is outside the crease but he is in the crease and in the mean while the keeper stumps him will he be out or not?
Or he is out sdie the crease but his runner is in side the crease then will he be out or not?
He doesn't get credited for the catch.I don't think that's right. I believe the substitute does get credited for the catch.
No one gets credited for runouts though, even though some scorers records the names of the fielders involved in the runout.
So I've been doing it wrong in my school cricket league then Credited a stumping to a sub keeper in our stats.
Little bit of trivia:
Batsman hit the ball to a silly fielder, it bounces off his helmet and the bowler catches it.
Out or not out?
Not out - and it's happened in 2006 (well almost).Little bit of trivia:
Batsman hit the ball to a silly fielder, it bounces off his helmet and the bowler catches it.
Out or not out?