First.Last
School Cricketer
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2017
Out of interest has anyone else noticed that when playing co-op on the same team on the 1 console/pc, the running between wickets is only controlled by 1 person?? This is terrible lol!
Yes, but they probably had a bit more cash to develop the game and decided to do more and different (I can see thick people and, what they were looking to achieve no connection) not totally different. Yes, the game is not where they want it to be at this juncture but they are committed to sorting it out. Perhaps less of the keyboard bravado and more 'positive' posting, does your mother know you use these words...?[DOUBLEPOST=1490221377][/DOUBLEPOST]Well done guys just well fracking done
Take a game that was great (BD14) and not build on that at all
Noticed online that there are less and less people playing
Great way to get rid of your fan base
Keep it up
Well fckin done
Who holds the licence for the ACB and ECB??? Tricky and is it too expensive...?Cricket Austrailia should view it as advertising and investing in youth the better the game the more people play it and the more interest there is in cricket.They should be begging big ant to do this not pricing them out of the market.Its not as if anyone else is making a high end cricket game.
Yes he is ginger and feels bad at being rude to many people especially young Australian women who make general enquiries about the lack of stats. However, he is just a pawn in a decent company and doesn't speak for them overall... If it was me, I would have seen the doctor about that rash but, that particular body part is alien to me, though mother knows best... Eh Norman...On the flip side, Ross is extremely sensitive and flies off the handle very easily. It doesn't take much to get the "negative response" from Ross and quite frankly after DBC 17 is a "release now, fix much, much later" type of game a lot of his rants and whinges seem less justified as the time goes by.
They seriously couldn't find out before release that fields don't stick? I don't believe that. The only downside to the PC version is I can't trade it in or give it away so I'm stuck with this $60 waste of money.
Yes, but they probably had a bit more cash to develop the game and decided to do more and different (I can see thick people and, what they were looking to achieve no connection) not totally different. Yes, the game is not where they want it to be at this juncture but they are committed to sorting it out. Perhaps less of the keyboard bravado and more 'positive' posting, does your mother know you use these words...?[DOUBLEPOST=1490221377][/DOUBLEPOST]
Who holds the licence for the ACB and ECB??? Tricky and is it too expensive...?
they were 100 times more active than what they currently are
That's a very bold accusation. Were you in the room when the decision to release the game was taken?They knowingly released a half arsed broken game
You conveniently fail to notice the budget and size of the companies that built those games. More $$ + workforce = faster developmentLets look at other developers that released a game with Issues
If they are getting upset, then there wouldn't have been 3 patches with 1 more patch in pipeline.They have no right to get upset when paying customers complain about the game
Again, a sweeping statement. Isn't it enough that Ross has acknowledged the issues at hand and is committed to fixing them?they released it without proper testing
typical bookies responseGeez! I wonder why that happened. Oh right! It's because of posts exactly like this.
That's a very bold accusation. Were you in the room when the decision to release the game was taken?
You conveniently fail to notice the budget and size of the companies that built those games. More $$ + workforce = faster development
If they are getting upset, then there wouldn't have been 3 patches with 1 more patch in pipeline.
Again, a sweeping statement. Isn't it enough that Ross has acknowledged the issues at hand and is committed to fixing them?
typical bookies response
why dont u go and spot fix a game
Please proof the hours of beta testing that the game has gone through - Please show me, would love to see it
That goes against what Ross has constantly said that the cricket series is their own project and they have the freedom to do what they want unlike the rugby league seriesAlso, don't the publishers have more say over when the game is released than the developers? I'm sure the release date was well out of BA's say so....anyways...
Also, don't the publishers have more say over when the game is released than the developers? I'm sure the release date was well out of BA's say so....anyways...
Look at DBC 14
they were 100 times more active than what they currently are
They knowingly released a half arsed broken game
The positive, lets see, 1: Batting is more fun and slightly more difficult than 14 (there is you positive) 2: only certain strokes work, play cut shot on fast bowler and wait wait for it .... the tries to reverse sweep
there are sadly not a lot of positives in this game
its now been 3 months and the game is still not fixed
Lets look at other developers that released a game with Issues
Horizon Zero Dawn - 3 Patches and game is fixed (much less than 3 months after release and no issues in releasing), no issue in getting the patch done and released, yet BA has excuses that they cant release it because of this or that
The Witcher 3 - fixed game in less than 3 monhts
They have no right to get upset when paying customers complain about the game, they released it without proper testing
Never has a username been more appropriate.
typical bookies response
why dont u go and spot fix a game