Email scam thought experiment

He was not given the money intentionally. I'm pretty sure the passenger would have been unwilling to give that much cash to him.

Meanwhile, the giver in this scenario is fully willing to give the money, and the receiver can take it without any moral burden.
 
Just putting it out, not connected to the original argument,


*Take note that these statements are coming from a reputed top company owner in India. So ideally he will be pro-capitalist
.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top