27% by my reckoning. Joyce, Pietersen and Strauss.cricketmad09 said:Funny if Joyce played aswell. That would make 36% of the English team that arent even English.
andrew_nixon said:27% by my reckoning. Joyce, Pietersen and Strauss.
And Australia of course, would never pick a player born outside of Australia.
http://www.planetcricket.org/forums/showpost.php?p=217660&postcount=43
valvolux said:As it turns out all they had was "barmy army" repeat x 1000..."people always ask us, who we are, where we come from etc. etc." and "England, England, England". Hardly the repertoire of the "best fans in the world". Anyone can get drunk, wear a silly hat and annoy the bejesus out of everyone around them.
Correct, forgot about him.wolf said:Geraint Jones as well, was he not born in Papula New Guinea and raised in Aus?
cricketmad09 said:Funny if Joyce played aswell. That would make 36% of the English team that arent even English.
We select based on one game now?
Drop Gilchrist? are you mad?
So what? He failed in 1 innings, plus he is in the team to do a little thing call wicketkeep instead.
andrew_nixon said:27% by my reckoning. Joyce, Pietersen and Strauss.
And Australia of course, would never pick a player born outside of Australia.
http://www.planetcricket.org/forums/showpost.php?p=217660&postcount=43
Sureshot said:Yeah he got some runs didn't he. 55 in the match was it? Not too shabby. If he does that in each test I'll be content.
You said they were the only people we should even consider dropping, so we're obviously ignoring anything prior to this Test. The fact that Clarke was gifted a spot through injury shouldn't matter even if the original superior option is fit, he must be retained because he performed okay in this one game.evertonfan said:I wasn't saying you should drop them, I was merely pointing out that those two were the worst of the performers.
brad352 said:You said they were the only people we should even consider dropping, so we're obviously ignoring anything prior to this Test. The fact that Clarke was gifted a spot through injury shouldn't matter even if the original superior option is fit, he must be retained because he performed okay in this one game.
evertonfan said:That's not sarcasm is it? I can never tell with you Jones doubters.
I think if he can add at least 30 to England's total in every Test match and holds onto all his chances, then that's worth his place in my opinion.
Sureshot said:Nope, no sarcasm. Although I still think Prior is a better choice as he plays spin well.