7th in the ICC Test Rankings, and you say Pietersen doesn't show enough attacking intent, yet his strike rates are far better, bar this 1 series from Strauss. Pietersen's far better than Strauss, and the fact everyone rates Pietersen as easily England's best player proves that. Pietersen is feared by bowling attacks. Look what he did to Makhaya Ntini this past summer. Ntini's a man who has been looking incredibly dangerous against Australia, and has troubled players for a long time with his angle, yet Pietersen was just walking across his stumps and flicking him to the on-side with complete ease. Strauss is not feared anywhere near as much, and doesn't have the capacity to destroy a bowling attack like Pietersen does.
Please stop with the 'current form' crap, I'll tell you again, last 3 series he's averaged 60.14, 49.66 and 58.80, scoring 3 hundreds, all 3 of them against 2 of the best 3 sides in World Cricket, with 2 against South Africa and 1 in India. Strauss has scored 4, but 2 came in 1 Test match and the other 2 have come against West Indies. Pietersen also has had 2 innings where he's got out in the 90's. He's in fantastic form, and the fact I'm backing my points with stats and not just making ridiculous claims proves that I'm right. Surely the fact you're the only one on this forum that has this opinion should also help settle it for you?