Yeah he looks like a msn who's barely batted for months and who will be bounced outBased on the evidence of these two matches, for the test series in NZ, I'd give Pope the gloves and pick Bethell instead of Cox.
Yeah he looks like a msn who's barely batted for months and who will be bounced outBased on the evidence of these two matches, for the test series in NZ, I'd give Pope the gloves and pick Bethell instead of Cox.
Coming back to this, is there a real chance he might've played his way out of the team?Based on the evidence of these two matches, for the test series in NZ, I'd give Pope the gloves and pick Bethell instead of Cox.
I doubt it, they seem to have essentially decided he'll get three games while Smith is unavailable.Coming back to this, is there a real chance he might've played his way out of the team?
Yeah, it really feels like Bethell is batting his way into the Test XI here.Great performance from the Barbados boys.
It's tricky giving Pope the gloves at 3, yeah. I think he could do it but there's already enough pressure on him with the bat. As it's short term it wouldn't hurt because everyone knows Smith would be coming back in. I still think they'll go with Cox but they must be looking at the way both of them have played this past two weeks and be tempted to pick Bethell.Yeah, it really feels like Bethell is batting his way into the Test XI here.
I'd definitely be giving the gloves to Pope and the drinks to Cox; the only question for me is whether you go 3. Pope , 6. Stokes , 7. Bethell / 3. Bethell, 6. Stokes , 7. Pope or 3. Bethell, 6. Pope , 7. Stokes