Future of Cricket, suggestion to the ICC

What do you agree with?


  • Total voters
    20
why do we need to be negative about the ICC... its governing the sport...it wont help being just negative about it...why not just help it any way we can...if enough pleople agree on a idea it will reach them... know what im saying..(not trying to be rude)
 
Does any one know how to reach/contact the icc or any of its members?
If you agree with most of the ideas, can you let me know which you don't agree with. If you agree with some, then can you let me know which you agree with. If you dont agree at all let me know why.
 
guys i redid the example tournament so that now you have have better vision of what it would be like...plus a poll has been added...so i get an idea...
 
i agree with all but ranking the winner of the test thing grand champion just leave it at odi champion 20 champion n test champion rakin it doesn have any point.
 
ICC38 said:
i agree with all but ranking the winner of the test thing grand champion just leave it at odi champion 20 champion n test champion rakin it doesn have any point.
point taken
 
Andrew Nixon someone gave this link to the associate rankings-
http://caughtbehind.com/btb/team-rankings/
and i was wondering if this was the lattest one or is there a more updated one? right now im using this ranking and was wondering is this more correct or is yours?
1 Kenya 150
2 Ireland 138
3 Scotland 137
4 Bermuda 130
5 Netherlands 126
6 UAE 120
7 Denmark 117
8 Namibia 116
9 Canada 115
10 Hong Kong 114
11 USA 113
12 Italy 112
13 Norway 110
14 Cayman Islands 108
15 Afghanistan 106
16 Jersey 104
17 Uganda 102
18 Papua New Guinea 100
19 Tanzania 99
20 Nepal 98
21 Germany 98
22 Gibraltar 92
23 Singapore 91
24 Botswana 91
25 Fiji 87
26 Guernsey 86
27 Bahrain 84
28 Argentina 84
29 Mozambique 82
30 Oman 81
31 France 80
32 Malaysia 76
33 Zambia 74
34 Israel 74
35 Cook Islands 74
36 Bahamas 72
37 Qatar 69
38 Hellas 68
39 Nigeria 65
40 Spain 62
41 Kuwait 61
42 Japan 61
43 Panama 60
44 Sierra Leone 57
45 Belgium 56
46 Portugal 50
47 Tonga 48
48 Suriname 48
49 Ghana 48
50 Saudi Arabia 47
51 Malta 44
52 Malawi 40
53 Thailand 39
54 Croatia 38
55 Belize 36
56 Vanuatu 35
57 Isle of Man 32
58 Bhutan 32
59 Morocco 31
60 Finland 26
61 Turks & Caicos 24
62 Brunei 24
63 Rwanda 23
64 Indonesia 22
65 Cyprus 20
66 Maldives 17
67 Luxembourg 14
68 Gambia 14
69 Chile 12
70 Samoa 9
71 Iran 9
72 Slovenia 8
73 Brazil 8
74 Lesotho 6
75 Myanmar 1
 
Last edited:
which is the latest? or more accurate?
 
Last edited:
andrew_nixon said:
They're both calculated up til the end of October at the moment. As for which is more accurate, that's your choice.
are you going to update any time soon? with the icc tri series happening?
 
I personally think that twenty20 should be something that is played exclusively at the domestic level. The 1 twenty20 for each series is all that is necessary. Here are a few things which cricket could use:
- Increase the Test series minimum from 2 tests up to 3 tests
- Limit ODI series to 5 odis (The 7 odis which they play in india is really boring)
- More Odis for Associates against full members. Tournaments like Asia cup could include more associates.
- More nations playing in the Intercontinental cup.
- Regional twenty20 tournaments world 2020 (Groups like asia, africa, americas, etc)
- Third Place matches in tournament such as 2020 world champs, world cup and champs trophy.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top