What will you prefer in the next 20-30 years.
1 ball format OR just a toss?
1 ball format OR just a toss?
https://www.cricket.com.au/news/ecb...ew-format-t20-domestic-competition/2018-04-19
T20s like; "Have I done anything wrong?"
You guys really think! Longer version of the game have a chance in the long run. Really. Empty stands dont tell you anything? . World is getting competitive by the day. This is the reality. Without t20 or t10 cricket will die. As simple as that
Where the hell are you watching the games?
IPL is packed (all games in India are generally full house), Sri Lanka is often sold out, Bangla is sold out, Ashes had a ridiculously decent turnout, Big Bash was stadium-packing!! Cricket doesn't need to change. It needs to be better promoted and a chance for new teams to play (i.e. Zim, Nepal, Ireland etc)
Yep seems so fast food cricket is the future. Might as well rename it to Slog!You guys really think! Longer version of the game have a chance in the long run. Really. Empty stands dont tell you anything? . World is getting competitive by the day. This is the reality. Without t20 or t10 cricket will die. As simple as that
Not in the 90s but in the 2010 - 2011 season they tried the 45 over format with a split of 20 and 25 overs including 12 players in a team.I wonder if people cant give it a try with 4 innings 50 over game. I think Aus tried it ones. Way back in 90's. Just before super sub
Am 100% sure they played a game betwin Australia and AUS A. That was in 1994 or 5.Not in the 90s but in the 2010 - 2011 season they tried the 45 over format with a split of 20 and 25 overs including 12 players in a team.
That's brilliant.ICC will grant T20I status for all 104 member nations.
source?ICC will grant T20I status for all 104 member nations.
ICC grants T20I status to all 104 member countriessource?