Have not seen such a shite Australian team in a long time. I get it that a lot of players are not participating but is the bench strength so weak? Also they have been so shite, no body even created a separate match thread for them
Wonder if it's a consequence of the BBL lacking high quality Australian internationals and the other one day tournament being quite weak.Have not seen such a shite Australian team in a long time. I get it that a lot of players are not participating but is the bench strength so weak? Also they have been so shite, no body even created a separate match thread for them
Yeah, facing Ben Manenti on a drop-in isn't quite preparing the Aussies for Shakib and Mahedi on a turnerWonder if it's a consequence of the BBL lacking high quality Australian internationals and the other one day tournament being quite weak.
Meanwhile Adam Lyth out-bowled Mujeeb the other night.Yeah, facing Ben Manenti on a drop-in isn't quite preparing the Aussies for Shakib and Mahedi on a turner
The ECB have a bag of magic beans, for a licensing fee of course.ICC to push for cricket's inclusion in the 2028 Olympics
Working group set up to see if the sport can be included in the Los Angeles games in 2028 and beyondwww.espncricinfo.com
Interesting....what format but?
It says in the article at the end that T10 is the likeliest format to be used.ICC to push for cricket's inclusion in the 2028 Olympics
Working group set up to see if the sport can be included in the Los Angeles games in 2028 and beyondwww.espncricinfo.com
Interesting....what format but?
I'm not sure if T10 is as popular a format as others. ODI is out of the question, T20 takes about 4 hours which is still a lot when compared to other sports. But that has been the bane for Cricket though all this while, hasn't it? The 100 maybe?It says in the article at the end that T10 is the likeliest format to be used.
T10 is shorter than the 100 thoughI'm not sure if T10 is as popular a format as others. ODI is out of the question, T20 takes about 4 hours which is still a lot when compared to other sports. But that has been the bane for Cricket though all this while, hasn't it? The 100 maybe?
The fact that I don't discount that as something he would actually do is quite depressing... :/@Na Maloom Afraad Salman Iqbal could soon take credit for bringing cricket to the Olympics
Baseball still sees an average of 300 pitches in a match which would equal to 25 overs a side.T10 means you can play more games in a shorter space of time. The less overs you play the more it turns into baseball though. It would be good if 15 overs, or 100 balls, could be used. But if the Olympic Committee are desperate for the shortest format then T10 is probably the shortest you can play without it getting ridiculous. I mean, imagine if they let Cricket in and made them play 5 over games. That would be going too far.
Yes, I meant the mindset for the batsman changes.Baseball still sees an average of 300 pitches in a match which would equal to 25 overs a side.
That's great it is my belief the World cup should remain a fifty over competition.No don't believe on that. It won't ever happen