Sherlock Holmes
PlanetCricket's Sherlock Holmes
PlanetCricket Award Winner
Champions League Winner
Avengers
dick towards Taliban*Why is Cricket Australia being such a dick towards Afghanistan, all in the name of morality?
dick towards Taliban*Why is Cricket Australia being such a dick towards Afghanistan, all in the name of morality?
As far as i know, no law has been passed yet in Afghanistan prohibiting women’s cricket.Why is Cricket Australia being such a dick towards Afghanistan, all in the name of morality?
dick towards Taliban*
It is completely fair for everyone to question ICC's silence on the matter since they are the governing council for the sport, but for CA to have this holier than thou attitude is fukcing ridiculous.As far as i know, no law has been passed yet in Afghanistan prohibiting women’s cricket.
The full member status was granted on the understanding that women's cricket would be developed.It is completely fair for everyone to question ICC's silence on the matter since they are the governing council for the sport, but for CA to have this holier than thou attitude is fukcing ridiculous.
The hard truth is, as Hamid Shinwari, ACB CEO said:
View attachment 255275
Strip them of their full-member status, fine, perfectly within the rules. CA not wanting to play Test cricket with them would then make sense.The full member status was granted on the understanding that women's cricket would be developed.
Incredibly scary, and there's really not a lot you can say other than hope and pray for their safety.Those women's cricketers; some have fled the country and others are in hiding for fear of the repercussions.
South Africa was isolated during apartheid. I don't see this as being much different. It would be a shame for the players but it was a shame that some South Africa players never got the chance to play internationally.Strip them of their full-member status, fine, perfectly within the rules. CA not wanting to play Test cricket with them would then make sense.
But what's this shit about Tim Paine saying "we shouldn't associate ourselves with Afghanistan"?
Are you really going to isolate an entire nation for something that's beyond their control? In the decades of turmoil the Afghans have spent, cricket has been the one thing they've had. You can't just take that away from them.
Incredibly scary, and there's really not a lot you can say other than hope and pray for their safety.
Was about to say, not too dissimilar to that. It would be a shame for the cricketers, but I guess the only difference is - the laws passed during Apartheid were passed by an elected, democratic government whereas in Afghanistan, these inhumane systems have been put into place by a hostile, extremist group of people that took over (after decades of war and terrorism) an already helpless general population. I don't think (or at least I would hope not) there's anyone in Afghanistan that isn't Taliban, endorsing the ban on women's cricket. So for an already helpless nation to face isolation for something they did not endorse, opt for or wanted do anything with would be kinda cruel, wouldn't you say?South Africa was isolated during apartheid. I don't see this as being much different. It would be a shame for the players but it was a shame that some South Africa players never got the chance to play internationally.
Women's cricket faced backlash in India in the 1970s, and was illegal by law in Pakistan and Sri Lanka in the 1990s and Bangladesh in the early 2000s - hardly the most high-profile instance in the region itself.Now, there's probably of other instances where perhaps countries should or shouldn't be treated in a similar way, but Afghanistan is a high-profile instance of that.
I do think some of us overplay sports' political importance. I doubt Jesse Owens winning Gold in 1936 made Mr. Hitler think 'you know, maybe this super-race idea isn't all that well-thought out tbh lol'.But, it may be that the soft power of sporting isolation could force a small change in Afghanistan that 20 years of occupation couldn't do.
Like it or not The Taliban are the government now. They will be recognised, tolerated or not. It will vary from country to country. Prior to that it was a puppet government, propped up by the US. I don't know what the people (including the cricketers) of Afghanistan would prefer. For a lot of Afghans life won't change at all, for some they might never be able to go back if they've left. It's an awful situation.Was about to say, not too dissimilar to that. It would be a shame for the cricketers, but I guess the only difference is - the laws passed during Apartheid were passed by an elected, democratic government whereas in Afghanistan, these inhumane systems have been put into place by a hostile, extremist group of people that took over (after decades of war and terrorism) an already helpless general population. I don't think (or at least I would hope not) there's anyone in Afghanistan that isn't Taliban, endorsing the ban on women's cricket. So for an already helpless nation to face isolation for something they did not endorse, opt for or wanted do anything with would be kinda cruel, wouldn't you say?
Women's cricket faced backlash in India in the 1970s, and was illegal by law in Pakistan and Sri Lanka in the 1990s and Bangladesh in the early 2000s - hardly the most high-profile instance in the region itself.
I do think some of us overplay sports' political importance. I doubt Jesse Owens winning Gold in 1936 made Mr. Hitler think 'you know, maybe this super-race idea isn't all that well-thought out tbh lol'.
Noob "in"
Thats going to be the big debate in the days to come. ODI dont seem to have a chance in term of Olympics, since most of the other sports tend to get done with their games quickly.T20s are interesting, but even shorter games like the T10 would be more explosive and quicker. Or who knows, ventures like The Hundred could be picked up as the format.