Garbage, I won't pay 20 pounds for that, I bought ICC2005 for I think 25 and it wasn?t worth it. Its gonne be same as ICC05 but updated squads, fixtures and some bugs fixed, and should'nt compare Football Manager with this, FM is best, someday we hope to see a cricket game like FM quality.
ICC 2006 Press Release/Screenshots
- Thread starter Ste
- Start date
FreddieFan
International Coach
usy said:
Don't hold your breath. FM takes time to be a good game because the amount of football fans out there. Cricket simply doesn't have the same fanbase so if they spend time developing a really good game they won't get the extra sales to make it worthwhile.
rickyp
International Coach
guys, hold you judgement till the game is out, theres still a month left for them to change it. With a game like ICC the graphics and everything like that would not take long to change and im pretty sure they would get the updated database + online play done before even thinking about changing the skin deep values of the game. Im looking forward to it it should be interesting to see what they change in the coming month
Bob Bamber
School Cricketer
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2006
- Online Cricket Games Owned
Have they taken the logo off Pietersens shirt?
G
Gilchrist
Guest
Don't think its anything new, because it's not. Just an updated Database. Empire are poor. They have lost me.
rickyp
International Coach
thats an interesting question. Im almost 100% sure that is the english shirt, but does that have a logo on the front? i cant rememberBob Bamber said:
IloveGilly
News Team Member<br><a href="http://www.planetcric
duffarama said:So in ICC 2005 they updated the graphics, in ICC 2006 they updated the teams.
Interesting.
Yes, same here. Don't think I'll be getting it at all.
smssia0112
Chairman of Selectors
- Joined
- Jul 15, 2005
Actually that has nothing to do with it, fm is better because it is a proper game by massive developers and publishers who have a lot of money. This is basically a download and play game which means that not as much marketing is available. It only catches the eye of true cricket fans,wheras people who see fm buy it because it is big and looks good to them even if soccer isn't their favourite sport.FreddieFan said:
My opinion
hondeyho
International Cricketer
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2005
- Online Cricket Games Owned
It isn't much of a database update either! It seems as though Mark Butcher and Graham Thorpe are in the England team :laugh
Either some sad fool put them there, or they are in the default England team. But they haven't progressed at all since 05, very dissapointed.
Either some sad fool put them there, or they are in the default England team. But they haven't progressed at all since 05, very dissapointed.
Azza!
Club Cricketer
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2006
- Online Cricket Games Owned
duffarama said:So in ICC 2005 they updated the graphics, in ICC 2006 they updated the teams.
Interesting.
Yep and in 2007 there's meant to be graphic updates! Some sort of pattern..
No different except the online play and powerplays.
The database looks old with Thorpe in the side - I will most definitely be waiting for the 2007 game.
barmyarmy said:
I stand corrected. A database update of 2005 and a features update from ICC2001...
And they changed the cover of the box!
Yorkshire_No1 said:
ICC2005 is nothing like as good as it's equivalent of FM.
They made Freddie a RM bowler (Is Rooney a defender?) , not to mention to diabolical AI.
The 2 games are not only incomparable, but FM is way ahead.
venom2011
Club Cricketer
I wonder if they're gonna have monthly charges like WOW. LMAO. Then ICC 2006 will be like a hybrid of FM and WOW........OMG could it be the best game ever ?!?!?!?!?
Rofl...............
Rofl...............
andrew_nixon
Chairman of Selectors
Will only be any good if they fix the bugs from ICC 2005, one of which has been in the game since ICC 2000.
Stephen Bailey
Executive member
Bob Bamber said:
That'll be down to licensing. The England logo was also missing from helmet Andrew Strauss was wearing on the cover of ICC 2005.
