m_vaughan
Chairman of Selectors
ronny_kingsley said:Well what I said was if India's bowling isnt comparable to Pakistan's then even Pakistan's batting isnt in the same lague as the Indian.
India's bowling is weak compared to Pakistan's simply because apart from the two spinners in Harbhajan and Kumble, no one really looks much of a threat. Pathan bowls well sometimes, but still a bit too inconsistent for my liking. I do not expect much from Agarkar, and I dont know much about the newcomers who have to prove a lot. Remember this is how the two bowling attacks appear before the series.
ronny_kingsey said:I still stand by my English "lollypop" attack.Barring some good sessions against Aussies in the Ashes Pom bowling attack hasnt been very special.
Mind you, the "lollypop" attack helped England in 2004-05 became only the second team in recent times (after Australia) to beat South Africa in South Africa. And it takes something special to beat Australia, no watter where you are playing them.
ronny_kingsley said:So mate still any doubts ????????
I do have a doubt actually mate. Are you JarryD's twin brother or something?
Very similar kind of posts.