Kshitiz_Indian
Executive member
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2006
- Location
- New Delhi, India
So the bottomline, will this match be a draw?
saisrini80 said:Is that 'sarcasm' to my post that Dravid and Laxman can bowl tomorrow??? If it is, quite STUPID!
I said that because Laxman and Dravid are off spinners, and with the pitch offering some turn and bounce, I think India need to use as much spinners possible to see if they can extract a victory here!
Edit: I just noticed in the ICC test championship table that India gain only 1 point if they win 4-0 this test series? Why the hell? They havent won a test series in the Windies for 35 years and they lost the last one 2-1. Why the hell does the table not credit India well if they win the current series?
Sreesanth can take wickets and restrict runs. It isn't possible, however, when an entire batting lineup is targeting you. And yes, good speeeds. 85 MPH is a very good speed. Faster than Pathan.ronny_kingsley said:Sreesanth can do all that and much more but he just cant take wickets and restrict runs.
Good speeds ???????? Optimism at its very best.
Agarkar: No arguement there. I feel he is currently India's best paceman for those reasonsBowlers who could do all that :
Sreenath,Agarkar,Zaheer,Kuruvilla (did that for 3 years),Pathan and now Munaf.
Wha? Haven't seen him try wide of the crease, then come in close to the stumps the next ball.See those things which you said ,contradictions are :
1)Angles. Munaf uses it the best and no one can deny that. (Remember Cook)
Umm...no. He got 4 out of his six wickets in his 6/55 from the slower ball.2)Well disguised slower ball which is usually blasted in the ODI's ?????
I remeber atleast one mistimed hook which was caught, and several Pakistani and English batsman (Prior, for instance) who didn't see it coming.3)Bouncer ???????? How many wickets has he taken with bouncer or even ruffled the batsman ????
Yes, they do. But he can swing it too, at shar pace. I remeber him swinging it all over against Inzi.4)Swing ????????Pathan and Agarkar get it in much more magnitude than him for sure .
Could anyone? He reverses it well, whether or not they brought him wickets is out of contxt.5)Reverse ????Couldnt remove the last England wickets in the 1st TEst even when it was reversing.
So what, it is bad? His death bowling has been excellent from what I recall.6)Yorker ????If he would have had a good yorker his death bowling would have been much better than it is what now.
Pahtan was in poor form.Say whatever but there are atleast 4 guys who should have been in the team ahead of Sreesanth (Pathan,Agarkar,Harbhajan,Zaheer)
He is not even considered an allrounder at domestic level!! He has barely bowled in tests since that, and hardly bowls in ODIs anymore!!Coming over to Michael Clarke well he wudnt be picked over a genuine bowler but surely he would be considered for the allrounders slot ahead of Watson on a dust bowl .
sohummisra said:I just watched the highlights of the fiasco at the end. Earlier, I thought Lara should be fined or disciplined, but in the end he did help things out. The umpires did not want to make a decision and it would be useless for everyone sitting around and waiting for someone else to do something.
bakshikshitiz said:So the bottomline, will this match be a draw?
Zaheer, no. He is too old, and has disciplinary problems. If he roars back into form, maybe. But we only need one experienced spearhead, and that is Agarkar.
He was kicked out because of disciplinary problems. I remeber reading that in my newspaper.cricket_lover said:Is 27 that old for you?
Who told you that he has disciplinary problems? If he had such thing, i don't think he will be doing that well for Worcs. He performed admirably well in Pakistan tests but kicked out for no reason...
Strange decisions....
Like you never imaginedsohummisra said:Sreesanth! Zorax, you're probably about ready to gloat, now.