that's dumb of him!
The point here is aus bowlers are also giving the same amount of runs, the key difference between the teams is acceleration at the death overs!
The bowling and fielding was horrible no excuse, but still i think the acceleration part makes the difference between the teams! I mean we didnt fail to accelerate because of some great yorker or smart bowling rather just trying to hoick the half volleys down the longons throat!
I think there is a difference. Chasing 300 is harder than scoring 300 batting first. The scoreboard does add its own pressure. While I agree that India have been poor with the bat in the end overs in both games, but I mean with the bowling even if India had scored 330, Aus would have gotten there comfortably.
Any bowling attack worth some weight would have saved at least one of the totals. In the first it was the spinners, now it was the seamers.
Tne way India are bowling it is only the target the keeps Australia from scoring beyond 310. If they had a free run batting first, they would easily score 350+ with the kind of bowling we have.
All said and done the batsmen did their job. If the bowlers can't defend it, then I don't really think its a defence to say that the other side's bowlers are also getting hammered, we are only getting hammered a little worse.
Its okay though, this is the return ODI series, of the one in India, where Ind regularly knocked down 350 totals to win. So One shouldnt grudge Aus some payback.
However the point on Umesh is that if you are openly going to have a go at the captain in an interview, you had better perform first.