angryangy said:By the looks and sounds of things they're basically just updating the game to the latest FIFA engine
Nav-D said:Its amazing how a few screens from EA can make some people think this game is the best thing since sliced bread. Who gives a flying f**k what the graphics are like when the gameplay would keep a normal individual engaged for 5 minutes, which was the case for me when I played cricket 2004.
EA will release the game, hype it a lot, then will pay some people to join cricket forums and comment on how 'amazing' the game will be and how everyone should go out and 'buy' it. They will cash in and you won't hear from them again. People will then buy and play the game and will then start moaning how bad the game is. A couple of years later the same process will repeat itself. Seems like people never learn. :
I'm really liking the way codemasters have structured their PR campaign, regular updates on the features of the game, plenty of screens and they actually make the effort of listening to their customers, by the looks of it anyway.
stevie said:You sir, have 'knocked the nail on the head' so to speak....
angryangy said:By the looks and sounds of things they're basically just updating the game to the latest FIFA engine
The ICC haven't given any license to EA. EA have got licenses from the cricket boards of Australia, England, New Zealand and South Africa.bharat said:May be what we could finally get in Cricket 2005 is cricket 2004 with FIFA engine.
I have a doubt.BLIC says it has official lisences.I think crick05 has also got ICC lisences.
How can ICC give lisences to two companies.
I tought it's meant to be given to only one company
Ever heard of Brian Lara's Cricket i think in 99 or sumtink like that. It was a brilliant cricket game, so on reputation alone they are the king of cricket games. EA have rushed thier cricket games out without even testing them, if they did test their cricket games, they would of picked up on a few of the bugs.BARRY_HALL said:I think everybody should stop slurring the game, and stop praising the game. Nobody knows what the game is going to be like, and how people can compare it to BLIC when both games havent even been released is ridiculous. Obviously everybody is dissappointed at EA for their past efforts, but who ever made CodeMasters the king of cricket games?
BARRY_HALL said:I think everybody should stop slurring the game, and stop praising the game. Nobody knows what the game is going to be like, and how people can compare it to BLIC when both games havent even been released is ridiculous. Obviously everybody is dissappointed at EA for their past efforts, but who ever made CodeMasters the king of cricket games?
Hicksy551993 said:well considering a DVD CD holds over 4 GB thats what youd expect
Everyone is slurring the game because the last efforts were very disappointing, whereas Brian Lara Cricket (or Shane Warne Cricket) was quite an enjoyable game. Also EA have a reputation for being over commercial (FIFA series I'm lookin' at you) whereas Codemasters' reputation suggests innovation, integrity and diversity (Worms, Colin Mcrae, Operation Flashpoint, hell, they're still releasing patches for Shane Warne Cricket). Even if it is unfair, you still can't stop people being cynical.BARRY_HALL said:I think everybody should stop slurring the game, and stop praising the game. Nobody knows what the game is going to be like, and how people can compare it to BLIC when both games havent even been released is ridiculous. Obviously everybody is dissappointed at EA for their past efforts, but who ever made CodeMasters the king of cricket games?