Jager Bombers - "It seemed like a good idea at the time!"

[CG123]

These results have been rather strange, considering in the 10 practice matches I did with these ratings:

1. 8/10 of the first innings totals were over 200.
2. 7/10 of the matches were won by the team batting first.

Very strange.

 

[Zohaib]

Is it going to be a 5 match series or 3 match series?

 

[CG123]

And I have no idea why Raval and McIntosh have dominated so much, considering the have exactly the same batting rating as the PC pure batsmen.

 

[Aussie Team]

Our sensational 183 was not enough to secure victory.

 

[CG123]

Is it going to be a 5 match series or 3 match series?

Unlimited atm.

2 matches a day until the real thing starts.

 

[barmyarmy]

And I have no idea why Raval and McIntosh have dominated so much, considering the have exactly the same batting rating as the PC pure batsmen.

Because no matter how much you plan for stuff cricsim is mostly random

 

[CG123]

BTW I am beating Shagger aint I?

Yes, atm you will starting ahead of him as our batting AR, because he hasn't shown much activity at all.

 

[Prats]

That was quick 50 balls 52 runs innings from me.

 

[CG123]

Because no matter how much you plan for stuff cricsim is mostly random

It's still interesting that Raval and McIntosh have gone:

48 (34), 96* (72), 58 (47), 100 (73)

While the other six pure batsmen have gone:

23, 0, 34, 10, 52, 15*, 17, 6, 28, 72*, 15*

I know how random it can be after using it for eight and a half seasons of NZPL.

 

[Chewie]

lol at me

 

[hedger_14]

Chewie could be dropped before it all begins

 

[Gaurav_7]

I know how random it can be after using it for eight and a half seasons of NZPL.

I guess it takes into consideration players' sim match averages as well. I mean someone goes on dominating if he does well earlier while someone with same ratings is poor and keeps failing with a random score in between if he doesn't go well earlier.

 

[CG123]

I guess it takes into consideration players' sim match averages as well. I mean someone goes on dominating if he does well earlier while someone with same ratings is poor and keeps failing with a random score in between if he doesn't go well earlier.

Does it? I'm not really sure tbh.

 

[Gaurav_7]

I think so. I've seen that happen quite a few times actually.

 

[Varun]

I have seen a lot of patterns in the individual scores as well. Sometimes the 38/39/40 rated players actually play like the 34/33/32 ones and vice-versa.