crazyrahul
Club Cricketer
- Joined
- May 23, 2009
- Location
- Mumbai, India
Sri Lanka has got a test of Wankhede pitch now, if they get it to final, it would be good for them. Spinners have the upper hand here.
Murali back into form.
----------
A very good point dude, strongly agree.
Indians also have Harbhajan in their ranks but don't have good fielders to support him.
Pakistan also have Afridi but poor fielding gives only disappointment to quality spinner.
Swann is also excellent off spin bowler but English fielders sometimes worst in fielding which doesn't help Swann.
Murali back into form.
----------
it's arguable whether sri lanka have the best spin attack in the tournament, what I think does seem apparent though is, as a unit it's the most likely to take wickets.
it's not just the spinner himself. it's the wicket-keeper to spin, the slip fielder to spin, the part-timers, the know-how and influence of the guy leading them, the guys in close. bangladesh, south africa and pakistan all came with strong spin attacks too, but they can't rival that collection of guys working with them.
A very good point dude, strongly agree.
Indians also have Harbhajan in their ranks but don't have good fielders to support him.
Pakistan also have Afridi but poor fielding gives only disappointment to quality spinner.
Swann is also excellent off spin bowler but English fielders sometimes worst in fielding which doesn't help Swann.
Last edited: