IAnd also Mr.Owzat , i would like you to help me out with the statistics regarding the part time bowler's performances of each team in this world cup . Is it only me or does everyone feel that England's part-timers are the least effective when it comes to taking wickets ??
Depending on how "part-time" you classify some bowlers, shouldn't be too hard to put together, that withstanding. Part problem is because it is being played where it is, spinners can be more effective part-timers and England's only spin part-timer is Pietersen
World Cup 2011 (Test part-timers in order of wickets taken)
5 : Dilshan (SRI) @ 10.40
5 : Kallis (SAF) @ 24.60
4 : Styris (NZE) @ 28.75
2 : Samaraweera (SRI) @ 4.00
2 : Hussey (AUS) @ 15.50
2 : Bopara (ENG) @ 20.50
2 : Ashraful (BAN) @ 26.50
2 : Duminy (SAF) @ 42.50
1 : Raina (IND) @ 12.00
1 : Du Plessis (SAF) @ 38.00
1 : Ryder (NZE) @ 67.00
1 : Collingwood (ENG) @ 116.00
I've included Kallis, he is an all-rounder with a lean towards his batting, but with less than five overs per match he is bowling less than 1/10 of the overs in a match. Styris likewise. Others who might normally bowl less have bowled more with spin being promoted so those normally more part-time make up overs for seamers not included (if that makes sense) I could include Yuvraj and arguably Hafeez and players like that. Not sure about Woodcock, not a player I know much/anything about.
There are a lot who have bowled and not taken a wicket, Wright is one as is Pietersen for England.
Perhaps more noteable wicketless part-timers include Gayle (WIN), Clarke (AUS), Matthews (SRI) before today, and Franklin (NZE), although I would classify Franklin as more of an all-rounder except he's not bowled that much (14 overs in six ODIs)
HowSTAT! Series Analysis