Pakistan in Australia

[shahid6995]

i voted for pakistan 3 0 take that my aussies friends

you need to seriousely watch your mouth young lad you are not much of ass too' straight up your english first' then abuse people like that' i wasn't expectin that from you vibs. may be you are jealouse because india lost 4 times to pakistan' i need to seriousely report this to ste
you just called pakistani people stupid what have they done too you vibs they have been making patche's for you guys to play and you are disrespecting them like this' lets come back to who voted for pakistan 3_0 i think and i think pakistan has the guts to beat aussie's 3-0' absloutely pathetic calling pakistani's stupid.

i will not mind if they lose the test series againts aussie's i am sure they will do well i odi's againts aussie's and west indie's.pakistan came close to beat aussie's twice once in world cup but ofcourse andrew symond took the game away from pakistan and in natwast when inzi and youhana made a brilliant partnership to beat aussie's but unfortunately they lost the game. i have seen pakistan performe well againts aussie's in odi's but to tell you the truth pakistan hasn't been close to beat the aussie's in a test match. what ever happend i will hope the best for pakistan'

shahid i think you are the first pakistani i have seen sofar who hate's shoiab akhtar. he has been a great contirbuter in the pakistani team ofcourse following shoiab malik and abdul razzaq.shoiab akhtar is one of the fastest bowler ever and he was the reason that pakistan won the match againt's india in the icc champoins trophy. shame on you calling your own people a child on crack cocaine.they maybe not as educated as the other people are in here but they have the heart they have they courage to tell the whole world that pakistan can beat aussie's 3_0 unlike you.pakistan might not beat aussie's 3_0 but still they are supporting there country and they think they have the abillity to beat aussie's 3_0.you think we are children on crack cocaine then what are you a babie on on crack. no offence but you really are an idiot. here are some example's of what kind of bowler shoaib akhtar is.

who won as the test match againt's new zealand. shoiab akhtar.

who gave tendulkar some hard time's again it was shoiab akhtar. probably that is the reason why sachin is god hate's shoaib.

who gave aussie's some challange when pakistan toured aussie's in 1999/2000
it was shoiab akhtar

who took 6 wickets in odi's againts aussie's in 2002. it was shoiab

who took 6 wickets againts new zealand it was shoiab akhtar

shioab is the best come this test match againts aussie's he will prove you wrong shahid'


dude the only time i have seen sachin making runs againts shoiab was in centurian and multan. shoiab has and had alot of success againts sachin recently in jubilee saching was dropped and who created the chance it was shoiab akhtar. although i agree with you that wasim akram did creat some problems for sachin in and the rest of the player's but you should consider shoiab one of the fastest and accurate bowler ever.i agree that he has some atitude problems but we should not blame him on that it is all about ability and the accurace and how he contirbuted for pakistan and for how long. he had injuries that could haved kept him away from international cricket but it wasn't enough to stop him play for pakistan.

dude pakistan has a great chance indeed no doubt about that.The only thing standing in pakistan's way is gilly Pakistan has to do some thing about gilly.They know this guy is in a great form and i want youhana to do some thing about that and i am sure he is thinking about getting gilly out as soon as possible a centurie from gilly will ruin pakistan's chances of winning the test match.I do agree with sachin gilly is a dangerous man for pakistan.
How do you like pakistan's performance so far shahid?
I am sure you wont be saying any more that pakistan has no chance againts aussie's whatsoever.

pakistan is going nicely 135/1 that is a good score i expect salman but to make hundreth and younis khan a half centurie.

Dude are you SURE you are not a Pakistani??

 

[Rangeela]

3rd Test Stumps Day 1

Pakistan won the toss and elected to bat first

Pakistan 292/9 (Butt 108) (MacGill 5/87)

 

[fardin]

No i am not a pakistani any doubt's?

 

[faraz haider]

well pakistan batted well today no doubt if they score 30 or 40 runs for the last wicket they can uptill challange the australians. well the main factor of there falling wickets was unaware of macgill bowling b/c they r habitual of playing warne and other factor is the injuries they suffer in this tour due to which inzy, razzak,shabbir and others r not playing but when u see 292/9 after these factors u can easily thought that it is a good total

He only bowled ten overs

so why not give him more when he gave only 28

 

[brad352]

so why not give him more when he gave only 28

Warnie and MacGill were bowling well in tandem, we've got better options

And the main factor of their falling wickets was the fact that they're all totally undisciplined, before you start blaming everything else look at your own players

 

[fardin]

I give both side's credit by playing well though.I dont really understand why they have shane watson in the bowling department(havent seen him batting yet)If they have a much better option like bret lee.This question has been asked before but there are alot of player's who are waiting to be called by aus cricket board that are much talented then shane watson.I have seen him bowling today he seem to be use less.
Sorry brad but I rather have bret lee in the bowling department.

bret lee has a good record againt's pakistan and i have seen him taking alot of wicket's againts pakistan both in odi's and test matche's
To be fair I think aus selector's has been unfair to bret lee.

 

[squiz]

Fardin, Shane Watson is there as an All-Rounder, Brett Lee may be a better bowler, but the Australian selectors want someone who can bat as well to replace Lehmann's absense in the team.

 

[faraz haider]

Warnie and MacGill were bowling well in tandem, we've got better options

And the main factor of their falling wickets was the fact that they're all totally undisciplined, before you start blaming everything else look at your own players

what they r totally indeciplined how could u say that the main factor was that in experience side(some played in australia not every one) and got an unawarness of the turning pitch and of fast pitch of course.
ok if pakistan have someone like inzy in there middle order than they should not be 292/9 b/c inzy can take one end and score from there and most of it he got exerience of these sort of pitches really which pakistani team not got

 

[brad352]

I give both side's credit by playing well though.I dont really understand why they have shane watson in the bowling department(havent seen him batting yet)If they have a much better option like bret lee.This question has been asked before but there are alot of player's who are waiting to be called by aus cricket board that are much talented then shane watson.I have seen him bowling today he seem to be use less.
Sorry brad but I rather have bret lee in the bowling department.

bret lee has a good record againt's pakistan and i have seen him taking alot of wicket's againts pakistan both in odi's and test matche's
To be fair I think aus selector's has been unfair to bret lee.

He isn't playing as a bloody bowler, he's an all rounder. If Brett Lee played along with the two spinners we'd have Warne batting at 7, which is bloody stupid. And how can you define how talented someone is when you haven't even seen them play? Watson is one of the most promising young cricketers we've got

what they r totally indeciplined how could u say that the main factor was that in experience side(some played in australia not every one) and got an unawarness of the turning pitch and of fast pitch of course.
ok if pakistan have someone like inzy in there middle order than they should not be 292/9 b/c inzy can take one end and score from there and most of it he got exerience of these sort of pitches really which pakistani team not got

You play on turning pitches, if you can't deal with them there's something wrong. And you can't defend half of your team being completely unaware of the state of the game and getting out to slogs, the fact is it's pathetic cricket and someone needs to have a long talk to them

 

[fardin]

This is what you call promising?

Career Statistics:
TESTS

M I NO Runs HS Ave 100 50 Ct St
Batting & Fielding 0 - - - - - - - - -

Balls M R W Ave BBI 5 10 SR Econ
Bowling 0 - - - - - - - - -

ONE-DAY INTERNATIONALS
(including 05/12/2004)
M I NO Runs HS Ave SR 100 50 Ct St
Batting & Fielding 27 18 9 316 77* 35.11 67.09 0 1 9 0

O M R W Ave BBI 4w 5w SR Econ
Bowling 168.3 8 791 18 43.94 3-27 0 0 56.1 4.69

FIRST-CLASS
(2000/01 - 2004/05; last updated 01/01/2005)
M I NO Runs HS Ave 100 50 Ct St
Batting & Fielding 33 57 7 2355 157 47.10 8 11 14 0

O M R W Ave BBI 5 10 SR Econ
Bowling 519.2 107 1902 67 28.38 6-32 2 1 46.5 3.66

LIST A LIMITED OVERS
(2000/01 - 2004/05; last updated 01/01/2005)
M I NO Runs HS Ave SR 100 50 Ct St
Batting & Fielding 65 55 13 1329 96 31.64 67.77 0 10 16 0

O M R W Ave BBI 4w 5w SR Econ
Bowling 339.3 10 1727 41 42.12 3-27 0 0 49.6 5.08

 

[brad352]

Look at the thing that says First Class (4 day games)
A batting average of 47 and bowling average of 28 in a competition where some State teams could give a few Test teams a run for their money is bloody awesome

 

[fardin]

or this is what you call promising
he can also be considered as an all rounder although he is more of regular bowler lets see his stats(bret lee)

(including 02/01/2004)
M I NO Runs HS Ave SR 100 50 Ct St
Batting & Fielding 37 36 6 593 62* 19.76 56.63 0 2 9 0

O M R W Ave BBI 5 10 SR Econ
Bowling 1230 256 4402 139 31.66 5-47 4 0 53.0 3.57

ONE-DAY INTERNATIONALS
(including 08/12/2004)
M I NO Runs HS Ave SR 100 50 Ct St
Batting & Fielding 91 39 13 381 51* 14.65 82.11 0 1 24 0

O M R W Ave BBI 4w 5w SR Econ
Bowling 762.4 60 3614 160 22.58 5-27 6 3 28.6 4.73

FIRST-CLASS
(1994/95 - 2004/05; last updated 01/01/2005)
M I NO Runs HS Ave SR 100 50 Ct St
Batting & Fielding 70 77 13 1133 79 17.70 55.81 0 4 19 0

O M R W Ave BBI 5 10 SR Econ
Bowling 2268.1 474 7712 290 26.59 7-114 13 2 46.9 3.40

LIST A LIMITED OVERS
(1997/98 - 2004/05; last updated 01/01/2005)
M I NO Runs HS Ave 100 50 Ct St
Batting & Fielding 114 51 18 478 51* 14.48 0 1 29 0

O M R W Ave BBI 4w 5w SR Econ
Bowling 976.5 77 4478 191 23.44 5-27 7 3 30.6 4.58

- Explanations of First-Class and List A status courtesy of the ACS.

 

[joesaadati]

Hello farin could you pls post me the link for the test match aus Vs pak in Sydney I lost the link. Pls hank you.

 

[squiz]

Lee has batting averages of 14-20, that's not what an all-rounder averages

 

[sachin]

2/205.can anybody explain the pathetic batting of the pakistani's.3 of macgills wickets were fom poor batting options.just not good enough.