Insomniac
Title Recipient
Dude, do you read? I honestly think you have a reading disability because you seem to like to skip over so many things.Sri Lankan war is over.
The situation in Pakistan is entirely different than in India or Sri Lanka. I dont understand why you think they are similar. Pakistan has an open border with a country that is over run with terrorists. They move freely between the two and there are many terror cells that operate within Pakistan itself. Stop trying to compare it to the Indian security situation or a now finished civil war. PCB will lose the legal battle, Even if Pakistan boycotts the world cup nothing will happen, they dont have the financial power to have any affect on world cricket.
Its sad but its true. PCB is just going to have to bend over and take it.
I clearly said that security assessments should have been taken of the other countries to justify that security is the only reason.
You asked (or rather stated that the PCB would lose the case) why the PCB would win the case, and I gave you the answers. The ICC when making the decision, however correct it may be, did not follow the proper procedure in doing so. I've clearly stated that above, and where the ICC went wrong.
Now, in a normal court setting, you would rule in favor of the PCB. Even in the CAS, you would have to rule in favor of the PCB. This isn't about the right thing to do, that has little matter in a court setting. In court, you have to look at the regulations by the book.
Let me give you an example. If a police officer arrests somebody, but doesn't fill out any of the paperwork (such as why he was arrested, etc), and the accused is brought in front of a judge, is it not likely that he will have to be let go? This happens all the time - it's just a matter of another technicality where the PCB have played their cards smarter than the ICC.