At the end of the day, I figured that with the potential exception of Yash, my top order isn't going to be troubled by more than one or two bowlers on any team - my top 5 either average 50 in Tests, 50 in first class, or both - so I could do with going with the best bowler of the options. It's a big take, but I genuinely think Van der Bijl was on the same level as Lillee and Garner. And he can bat well enough to be... well, #8, but my #5 averages 91 at Test level so I can afford him a tad high lol.Franklyn Stephenson is the all-rounder that I'm thinking of, but there were others available who might have served your team balance a little better, even if Vince is the better bowler.
Pld | Won | Tied | Draw | Loss | Points | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
@Yash. | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0-0-0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 19 |
@Aislabie | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0-0-0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 18 |
@Neptune | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0-0-0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 17 |
@CerealKiller | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0-0-0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 16 |
@Till Valhalla | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0-0-0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
@ahmedleo414 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0-0-0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
@Supreme General | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0-0-0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
@Perfect Square | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0-0-0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
@Aravind. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
@ddrap14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
@icyman | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
@mohsin7827 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
@Paranoid Kendroid | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |