Kshitiz_Indian
Executive member
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2006
- Location
- New Delhi, India
Right like other teams didn't win in bowling tight games. :sarcasm Three of my nats were bowlers, two playing every game. And they've taken the most wickets in our team. Of course if I now start playing Bob Massie [Who's a fast bowler] on a dusty pitch, results aren't going to be very pretty.What else are we supposed to think when we are told that KI's sim has a problem with bowlers. Should have gone with cricsim, at least we knew it worked. :doh
Its not like I'm saying there's no problem with the sim. I acknowledge all problems, I fixed TONS of them along the season even though I hadn't committed to any bug fixes during the season (Zorax can tell you that, I had told him I wouldn't find much time). I know there's a problem with the economy rates of bowlers in the sim. I'm just saying its not like that its the very reason that you lost and other teams won. Other teams had Nat bowlers as well (Including mine, which is in finals now).
At the end of the day you have to realize that simming does have a lot of luck element in it. No sim can give the same results on every sim. It might happen that you test and win 11 times out of 15 but it might be that the one time the simmer simmed you lost. Being T20 this aggravates even more.
Kshitiz_Indian added 1 Minutes and 52 Seconds later...
TT spent 300k in the first season yet avoided relegation whereas we had spent 5mn + and still finished last. So that shouldn't have happened in the first place?How was anyone supposed to know the two teams the played the most money for nats, would be the bottom two. TBH it shouldn't have have happened in the first place.