There's another article up on cricinfo - a stats one:
The Numbers Game: Welcome back Rahul Dravid | Regulars | Cricinfo Magazine | ESPN Cricinfo
It has a REALLY interesting table down the bottom - most runs in partnerships in Test cricket. Rahul Dravid the the all-time leader, yes ahead of Sachin even. It's about time that cricket statisticians recognise partnerships a bit more, as cricket is seen in the stats world as an individual game - and I'm not so sure it is. Most of it is individual, yes, but being able to bat and bowl in partnerships is an often overlooked attribute. Coaches and captains mention it a lot, but you never see any stats on it.
Personally, I think guys who really dominate partnerships eg. Sehwag, probably aren't as valuable as they seem to be. Sure Sehwag might average over 50, but he might score 60%+ of the runs while he's in, so the score might only be 75 when he gets out. The team gets less out of his average of 50 than Dravid's average of 50, if you get what I mean.
The Numbers Game: Welcome back Rahul Dravid | Regulars | Cricinfo Magazine | ESPN Cricinfo
It has a REALLY interesting table down the bottom - most runs in partnerships in Test cricket. Rahul Dravid the the all-time leader, yes ahead of Sachin even. It's about time that cricket statisticians recognise partnerships a bit more, as cricket is seen in the stats world as an individual game - and I'm not so sure it is. Most of it is individual, yes, but being able to bat and bowl in partnerships is an often overlooked attribute. Coaches and captains mention it a lot, but you never see any stats on it.
Personally, I think guys who really dominate partnerships eg. Sehwag, probably aren't as valuable as they seem to be. Sure Sehwag might average over 50, but he might score 60%+ of the runs while he's in, so the score might only be 75 when he gets out. The team gets less out of his average of 50 than Dravid's average of 50, if you get what I mean.
Last edited: