Should Andy Bichel have gone to Sri Lanka?

[Radaga]

votes yes or no

 

[Radaga]

Yes, he contributes well with the bat and ball.
I think he is probably a better bowler than Lee.

 

[Iron-Haggis]

Andy Bichel would have to be the most unluckiest cricketer in the world. He should be in Sri Lanka ahead of Williams, Kasprowicz and especially Harvey.

 

[squiz]

I voted no, but it could of gone either way. he hasn't performed up to scratch in VB Series, and the TVS Cup. I think he needs to be back in form first. But for tests i think they should of picked him. He is a great partnership breaker for Australia, and they really missed him in some of the tests in Australia against India. So ......................

 

[Iron-Haggis]

I think they missed being able to catch more in the test matches. I read somewhere that Bracken would of had an average of 28 against India if they didn't drop so many catches off his bowling.

 

[Rangeela]

I said no due to his recent performance

 

[Sadistic_Shyte]

He gets a "Yes" from me -- I'd have included him in my squad.

 

[bomber]

I voted yes, but only just as he has been down on performance. But, all players have a slump from time to time. (excluding Bradman).

He is a unlucky player though. There's been times in the past where he has been in perfect form and gets dropped from the side.

 

[duffarama]

Harvey should get his chance in tests. He has done well in the One Dayers and deserves a chance.

___________________
Cricket 2004 = joke?

 

[madmattg]

He would have had a good tour, ah well he missed out again.

 

[Auwais]

Originally posted by duffarama
Harvey should get his chance in tests. He has done well in the One Dayers and deserves a chance.

I knew you wouldn't last long without bumping another old topic.

 

[italiansammy]

I think he should have...

 

[duffarama]

And since Harvey is in the tour squad for Zimbabwe v Australia, would that mean that he 'could' play in the tests?
From Duffarama

_____________________________
Go the Vics!