Sportsbook - Requests and Comments

@Field Marshal i bet on Nakamura because he had the lower odds. It's not really fair that i lost my money because of that.[DOUBLEPOST=1507548613][/DOUBLEPOST]@asprin
 
@Field Marshal i bet on Nakamura because he had the lower odds. It's not really fair that i lost my money because of that.[DOUBLEPOST=1507548613][/DOUBLEPOST]@asprin
So you are requesting for a refund? That's not possible. Odds don't always determine the match result. It maybe of Cricket, WWE or any other event. It will 50% depend on your risk taking ablility and 50% on the odds.

You can't always expect a team having low odds win the game. That's ridiculous!
 
So you are requesting for a refund? That's not possible. Odds don't always determine the match result. It maybe of Cricket, WWE or any other event. It will 50% depend on your risk taking ablility and 50% on the odds.

You can't always expect a team having low odds win the game. That's ridiculous!
Yes, but the odds help you in betting on someone you think is going to win. I bet on Nakamura because he (wrongly) had the lowest odds to win. So his odds misled me into betting on him.
 
So his odds misled me into betting on him.
I concur with PE. It seems like you simply went with the one whose returns were the lowest (without having knowledge about who the stronger participant among the two was) in anticipation that he will have the highest chance of winning. Though technically that is right, but it's not always the case.

Since NMA had that knowledge, he knew that the odds were wrong. You just happened to be unlucky in that the odds were fixed after you placed a bet. Your thinking wasn't that wrong, it's just that the odds were mixed up. It happens, we just gotta move on.
 
Yes, but the odds help you in betting on someone you think is going to win. I bet on Nakamura because he (wrongly) had the lowest odds to win. So his odds misled me into betting on him.
You should be kidding here. Why would anyone place the wager on the outcome that has the lowest odds? Say, Afghanistan beat Australia in the 1st game and has the low odds in the 2nd gane compared to Australia's odds. Would you bet on Afghanistan only because it has lowest odds?

Look, the storyline of WWE was quite clear from beginning. You did the mistake by yourself. No one has forced you to wager on Nakamura.

Note: I've lost nearly 10 M in the past were I placed the wagers on outcome having low odds and the opposite team had won the game. What can I do when my luck was not with me?
 
Yes, but the odds help you in betting on someone you think is going to win. I bet on Nakamura because he (wrongly) had the lowest odds to win. So his odds misled me into betting on him.
Well if I remember correctly only NMA bid on that event before I updated...
 
Well if I remember correctly only NMA bid on that event before I updated...
I did too.
Note: I've lost nearly 10 M in the past were I placed the wagers on outcome having low odds and the opposite team had won the game. What can I do when my luck was not with me?
That's not the point. The point is, the odds were wrong.
 
Look, the storyline of WWE was quite clear from beginning. You did the mistake by yourself. No one has forced you to wager on Nakamura.
I didn't follow it. That's not my fault. The odds are there to help you decide even if you haven't followed the event, and in this case they were misleading.[DOUBLEPOST=1507551117][/DOUBLEPOST]
It was later corrected? And also it was mentioned in this thread?
That didn't have any effect on my wager.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top