The odds are there to help you decide even if you haven't followed the event, and in this case they were misleadin
Your thinking wasn't that wrong, it's just that the odds were mixed up. It happens, we just gotta move on.
The odds are there to help you decide even if you haven't followed the event, and in this case they were misleadin
Your thinking wasn't that wrong, it's just that the odds were mixed up. It happens, we just gotta move on.
Just a tip. If you aren't sure about an event then don't bid on it by just seeing the odds. I would've been the first one to bid on that event. If I just consider the odds.I didn't follow it. That's not my fault. The odds are there to help you decide even if you haven't followed the event, and in this case they were misleading.
You should be kidding here. Why would anyone place the wager on the outcome that has the lowest odds? Say, Afghanistan beat Australia in the 1st game and has the low odds in the 2nd gane compared to Australia's odds. Would you bet on Afghanistan only because it has lowest odds?
I didn't follow the storyline, but i am familiar with WWE, so the odds made me think that it's probable that Nakamura is going to win. And in WWE, it very often is the case that the one with the lowest odds wins, because people on the inside who know the result before the match place huge bets on the winner, and end up lowering the odds. Take Royal Rumble 2017 and the Intercontinental Championship Ladder Match at WrestleMania in 2016.Just a tip. If you aren't sure about an event then don't bid on it by just seeing the odds. I would've been the first one to bid on that event. If I just consider the odds.
As PE said.
Will be done by @PresidentEvil asap.
As the remaining time was pretty less, I have put it up.
I don't know anything about it@CerealKiller do you know anything about boxing?
I would like to bet 1 million on the groves vs eubank fight, this saturday.if you can set it up
Deontay Wilder v Luis Ortiz, March 3rd. Pretty big fight, anyone up for making this an event?