Very interesting set of statements, because without Muralitharan, it could have very well been 3-2 to Sri Lanka rather than 5-0.I wish Zimbabwe pulled off a win.
Typical of Murili though. He's a pretty over-rated bowler. Such a large proportion of his wickets are against Zimbabwe and Bangladesh, it's a joke. He's got so many wickets this series he'll be on the top ODI wicket taker list after having an average year and probably have the best stats solely from this series.
What's with Zimbabwe getting to play 5 ODIs? They're a bad side and don't deserve such a big series until they can prove they can compete.
Sri Lanka claim the series 5-0, but the series was not as one-sided as the scoreline suggests. Zimbabwe were completely outplayed in the first two games, but failed to build on a winning position of 134 for 1 in the third, where they fell short by just five runs. They gave the visitors a run for their money in the fourth game as well, losing by just two wickets. They looked down and out at 58 for 6, but Utseya and Dabengwa added 72 for the seventh wicket to take Zimbabwe within 23 runs of victory. Kulasekara, though, struck back with two quick wickets against the run of play to snatch the game from the hosts.
Zimbabwe will be ruing not being able to finish off games after getting into a winning position. They lost their last four wickets for three runs.
are you kidding me?What's with Zimbabwe getting to play 5 ODIs? They're a bad side and don't deserve such a big series until they can prove they can compete.
Nice Cricinfo Copy and paste
anyway. I enjoy the Sri lankan side and its good to see then pull off 5-0 although there batting was a bit worrying