He did not pick up a wicket. So - 15 but bowled with < 6 rpo economy so + 2. Total -13.Why does Bravo have -13 for his bowling?
Uhm, isn’t that the ESPNCricinfo article? The Ashwin vs Gambhir one.He did not pick up a wicket. So - 15 but bowled with < 6 rpo economy so + 2. Total -13.
[DOUBLEPOST=1523171034][/DOUBLEPOST]Also blog mode is almost ready for getting published live. We already have @AK MODS and @Yash. who are willing to write. The feature should be up and live once we have our first article written.
The layout below looks weird as I zoomed out to 40% to get the screenshot. In real it looks pretty decent.
New layout coming up
View attachment 208129
Yes, I copied it for testing. You willnot not seee it actuallyUhm, isn’t that the ESPNCricinfo article? The Ashwin vs Gambhir one.
That's not fair tbh. Not picking up a wicket shouldn't have any penalty, I feel.He did not pick up a wicket. So - 15 but bowled with < 6 rpo economy so + 2. Total -13.
Agree. If someone bowls 0-10 in 4 overs, he has probably won the match for his team.That's not fair tbh. Not picking up a wicket shouldn't have any penalty, I feel.
I agree with you.That's not fair tbh. Not picking up a wicket shouldn't have any penalty, I feel.
Alright! I am not sure if I can reverse back. So for Match 1 I will leave it at -15 for bowlers not picking up wicket. I will however not get that calculations for Match 2 onwards.That's not fair tbh. Not picking up a wicket shouldn't have any penalty, I feel.
Common man I have Rahane and Unadkat and they both did something today.Yeah it will be fair if you don't score the game.