Oh Yeah. Gonna be craving with the snack with a hole bigger than the gap between Bairstow's bat and pad.The hoola-hoops one is a pretty obvious bag of Ready Salted as well mind.
Oh Yeah. Gonna be craving with the snack with a hole bigger than the gap between Bairstow's bat and pad.The hoola-hoops one is a pretty obvious bag of Ready Salted as well mind.
Alas I'm afraid no such hole existsOh Yeah. Gonna be craving with the snack with a hole bigger than the gap between Bairstow's bat and pad.
Think the Welsh Fire kit might have broken my TV.Alas I'm afraid no such hole exists
No Super Overs for Tied games in Hundred?
Had one in Cricket 19 tournament, was excited for a superover but then Ugly Slater Voice came over transition in to the tournament screen.
Anyone that doesn't like the hundred has no balls.
- want a new, fresh, exciting tournamentNope. One point each for a draw I believe.
Smoke a cigar.So apparently no point in marketing it to the Mums then.
They are too busy trying to block. It's not working.- want a new, fresh, exciting tournament
- take out the most exciting part of a cricket match, a Super Over
This is a sensible change tbh; I think it used to be this way in Cricket 07?New batsman on always on strike
A borrowed regulation from the Blast which works well there tooThe fielder penalty when you don't reach the cut off for the final over
This is where I really disagree though. It's just needlessly complicated, especially for the new viewers the tournament is aimed at, to constantly be speculating about if a bowler's staying on for a second over or not. And that's as someone who still likes the tactical flexibility of itChanging ends after two overs is good and the double over is a nice one too
I think the first one would always have made more sense tbh. Just please not the weird double over thing.Would certainly see the first two being added to other limited overs matches
I didn't realise the fielder penalty had already been used. I wonder why they don't ever mention that.... It is something I would like to see in all limited overs matches. If they could find a way to speed up test cricket, even better.This is a sensible change tbh; I think it used to be this way in Cricket 07?
A borrowed regulation from the Blast which works well there too
This is where I really disagree though. It's just needlessly complicated, especially for the new viewers the tournament is aimed at, to constantly be speculating about if a bowler's staying on for a second over or not. And that's as someone who still likes the tactical flexibility of it
I think the first one would always have made more sense tbh. Just please not the weird double over thing.
They don't have them in the Blast either. As great as a tie or a draw in cricket can be, it does seem that in a quick format there should be an outright winner achieved in some way.- want a new, fresh, exciting tournament
- take out the most exciting part of a cricket match, a Super Over