The My Sport is better than yours thread

Soccer is a boring one dimensational game with no variation and no excelleration.

Logically, AFL is the best sport in the world because it's the most entertaining to watch and best to play. It takes a variety of skills & requires great fitness.

I'm glad AFL is only Australian based because they've got the setup & salary cap perfect so that on average you'll see 6/8 competitive games each round.

Soccer is also crap because one team can dominate but one shot on goal from the opposition and a blunder from the keeper can cost you the match.

1-0 isn't a decisive victory.

Typical argument as to why Football is supposedly crap.

Sweeping genralisations from people who know very little about the sport (Now I'm making generalisations)

If the complexity of the sport makes it great then Chess is fatr and away the greatest sport on Earth. Football is popular because all you need is a ball. It's genius.
 
I'm not trying to sound rude or anything, but where is the complexity in the game?

Don't be too harsh on me now, I just want to know the "science" of the game, what makes it so good?
 
The Western European football teams are all boring - so are their styles. They depend so much on boorishness and physical prowess over skills of manipulation and control of the ball.

Messi, Henry, Ronaldo, Fabregas, Gerrard, Kaka, Torres, Scholes, Rooney, Joe Cole, Ronaldinho, Robben, Schneider, Pato, Ibrahimovic, Eto'o, Nedved (even though he's old).

I bet you don't even know who half those players are.

Will_NA added 0 Minutes and 45 Seconds later...

I'm not trying to sound rude or anything, but where is the complexity in the game?

Don't be too harsh on me now, I just want to know the "science" of the game, what makes it so good?

Read my post again.
 
The Western European football teams are all boring - so are their styles. They depend so much on boorishness and physical prowess over skills of manipulation and control of the ball.

Haha are you serious?

Football is undoubtably the best sport in the world. How can you say football is boring, you can just as easily say cricket is boring. Some teams may play boring football but the best teams don't. Man Utd this season were great to watch because they played quick tempo-d, passing and moving football.

And those who said that there is too much dominance in football, aren't Australia dominant in cricket?

so many stupid arguements against football.
 
Here's why Football is the most popular sport in the world.

Take a few people (any number more than 1), 2 jumpers and a ball and you've got yourself a football match. Don't have a ball? Doesn't really matter, use an empty coke can or something. Don't have jumpers then use 2 people who are rubbish!

It can be played by anyone, anywhere. Try playing cricket with a coke can (actually that might be funny to watch).

Also I think its pretty hard to match the atmosphere at a big footie match or down the pub when there is one on tv. The rules are pretty easy to understand, its pretty obvious at all times who is winning and the game doesn't go on for too long. Try explaining the rules of cricket to your missus, even umpires get it wrong!

Still prefer cricket mind.
 
People earlier were going on about toughness making each respective sport great, well here is a TRUE hard-man, Wayne Shelford (I remembered hearing this on Fighting Talk):
Shelford made his Test debut for the All Blacks later that year against France in a 19–7 victory in Toulouse, and then was a notable victim of the infamous "Battle of Nantes" in the second Test. Roughly 20 minutes into the match, he was caught at the bottom of a rather aggressive ruck, and an errant French boot found its way into Shelford's groin, somehow ripping his scrotum and leaving one testicle hanging free. He also lost four teeth in the process. Incredibly, after discovering the injury to his scrotum, he calmly asked the physio to stitch up the tear and returned to the field before a blow to his head left him concussed. He was substituted and watched the remainder of the game from the grandstand where he witnessed the All Blacks lose 16–3. To this day Shelford has no memory of the game.

Taken from his Wiki page
 
Typical argument as to why Football is supposedly crap.

Sweeping genralisations from people who know very little about the sport (Now I'm making generalisations)

If the complexity of the sport makes it great then Chess is fatr and away the greatest sport on Earth. Football is popular because all you need is a ball. It's genius.
I love you, William.

The atmosphere at football as well, just brilliant, the nerves, the tension. I've felt the most nervous and the most happy I've ever felt watching football.
 
*Silence as everyone in the world outside New South Wales and Queensland stares at Feelin Blue.*

LOL. Made me laugh.

But seriously, Rugby League has a lot of skill if you actually watch a game. If you watch 10 minutes you will probably only see a team doing the hard yards early or if your lucky you might see some good play.
 
Here's why Football is the most popular sport in the world.

Take a few people (any number more than 1), 2 jumpers and a ball and you've got yourself a football match. Don't have a ball? Doesn't really matter, use an empty coke can or something. Don't have jumpers then use 2 people who are rubbish!

It can be played by anyone, anywhere. Try playing cricket with a coke can (actually that might be funny to watch).

Also I think its pretty hard to match the atmosphere at a big footie match or down the pub when there is one on tv. The rules are pretty easy to understand, its pretty obvious at all times who is winning and the game doesn't go on for too long. Try explaining the rules of cricket to your missus, even umpires get it wrong!

Still prefer cricket mind.
That's the other reason, it is definitely the easiest to pick up.

I'm not one of the guys in here who's going to start bagging the crap out of soccer. I've been to an A-League game and I sometimes watch the Premier League on TV, and I don't necessarily find it boring. Cricket isn't exciting, that's the truth, I love going to the cricket because it's a day out. You don't need to concentrate all day, and you can chant at the opposition all day. I like AFL because it's exciting and entertaining.

I see AFL as a sort of logical evolution on soccer. Take soccer, but you can pick up the ball now and drop kick it, let players tackle each other to the ground, make goals more common and therefore, make it more exciting. Soccer's simplicity is great, and I don't hate it, but I prefer AFL.

People talk about atmosphere, but from my experience, so called atmosphere is people chanting all game, mexican waves and the like. I also find that this is most common in game which is not particularly exciting. You can't be watching a game intently if you're busy chanting or waving. You may still be enjoying it, but in the same way that you enjoy cricket.

And as for dominance, there's a big difference between international dominance, and domestic dominance. Australia is the best because it produces the best sportsmen. Manchester United is the best because a rich guy owns it. There's no natural evolution of teams getting better, it just comes down to which rich guy buys out a club.

In AFL, there is a salary cap, so that all teams are on level ground with paying players, there is a drafting system, so that the best young talent goes to the worst teams, and what you see is shorter periods of dominance, what you see is teams up for a few years then down for a few years. What you see is 6 different premiers in the last 8 years. And you see the team that won the premiership 2 years ago near the bottom of the ladder, needing to rebuild because its head got too big and its best player walked out because of the poor culture. In soccer, players walk out because of their pay cheque, even if they're making enough money per match to feed every homeless person in England for a week.

But forget about the evenness of the competition for a minute if you want, and talk about the popularity in a real situation. A country that watches both. England don't watch AFL, they might have a highlights package on cable TV at 3am, but they don't get to go to live AFL matches, and they don't see enough to appreciate the game. Australians have the option of going to Rugby Union, Rugby League, Cricket, Soccer and AFL matches, but AFL is still the most popular. It is now 150 years old, and started off as a game to keep cricketers fit in winter. Australians have had the option to start liking soccer, but haven't. As someone put it, we used to be your 'bitches,' and yet the sport never spread, because Australians obviously don't appreciate it as well, but either way, AFL has won because it's more exciting. That is the argument of every AFL fan, that it's more exciting, so that seems to be the reason it's more popular.

In soccer, a blowout is 3-0. In AFL, it's something like 150-60. Goals occur more often, teams today play on at all costs to advance ground. There's no standing around, trying to build up (not a generalisation, but something that I've seen even in a Liverpool v Man United game), and if a team does kick a flukey goal, it doesn't change the match. There's time to reverse the trend, time to get in front, and often you see an avalanche of goals from a team fighting its way back into the game. These are all things that you won't see in soccer.
 
Isn't Aussie Rules the oldest football coe in the world? Yet people say it's ripped off Gaelic. I enjoy watching soccer, but I love my AFL and cricket more. I'll still watch the Aussies play, but not as passionately.

PS. Dean, shouldn't you be at school? Or you got a week of for Exams?
 
Isn't Aussie Rules the oldest football coe in the world? Yet people say it's ripped off Gaelic. I enjoy watching soccer, but I love my AFL and cricket more. I'll still watch the Aussies play, but not as passionately.

PS. Dean, shouldn't you be at school? Or you got a week of for Exams?

Isn't it based off gaelic? That's what we got told in our PE class.

don't see what the fuss is about what sports better, I love Rugby League, AFL, Cricket, Soccer/Football, Tennis, Union to a degree, Gaelic and International Rules (Aus vs Ire)
 
People talk about atmosphere, but from my experience, so called atmosphere is people chanting all game, mexican waves and the like. I also find that this is most common in game which is not particularly exciting. You can't be watching a game intently if you're busy chanting or waving. You may still be enjoying it, but in the same way that you enjoy cricket.
It's supporting your team, you can still watch the game, but be singing and pushing your team on at the same time. It makes the atmosphere much better.

Joe, poor form:p. -10 Top Red points;)
 
It's supporting your team, you can still watch the game, but be singing and pushing your team on at the same time. It makes the atmosphere much better.

Joe, poor form:p. -10 Top Red points;)
Well if you ask me, the more exciting a game is the less chanting you will be doing. To concentrate fully on the game you can't really be cheering the whole time.

Gaelic is older than Aussie Rules, but I don't think there's any evidence to suggest that it was based upon Gaelic. It's also believed that Aussie Rules may have, in some way, been based upon an Indigenous sport played by Aborigines called Marn Grook (I think).

Interestingly, this week the Melbourne Football Club became the first organised sporting club in the world to celebrate 150 years. It is about 20 years older than Manchester United.
 
Play a man's sport, people.

solitaire.gif
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top