The PlanetCricket.org Mafia - End game

[CerealKiller]

Unlunch
Lynch : CerealKiller

Still waiting for an explanation.
Btw, Rudolph roleclaimed to be a roleblocker and to have blocked Simon, how come no one has adressed that?

 

[zwarrior]

Coming to zwarrior, his reason for targeting me is that i didn't realise that it's possible that there is a pro-Town Vigilante before reading his post. The truth is, i didn't pay attention to some of the posts before his (some). He is lynching me on purely hypothetical grounds.

lol man. How many times will you say the same thing ? I have said so many times that, it is not the reason for me voting to you. And you somehow ignore everything else and focus only on that because it is convenient to you.

For all the readers, please see posts 155, 158, 179, 184, 199, 213 (recent one) for my reasons on why I voted for CK.

I cannot explain more than this and I rest my case.

My lynch stays.

 

[asprin]

So he wouldn't have avoided the thread for this long.

Maybe that were the instructions after all - to be silent and see how things pan out.

Then, he accused me of shifting the spotlight from Ali, because i was targeting Rudolph, who, as all of you can see in the previous pages, was making posts bordering on the ridicolous.

You said it yourself. It was ridiculous behavior - the only explanation that seems logical is that he was not himself there and was hacked/instructed to do so.

Coming to zwarrior, his reason for targeting me is that i didn't realise that it's possible that there is a pro-Town Vigilante before reading his post.

No, he is targeting you because your reason of being busy as a result of a test match in play was found to be false by him.

 

[CerealKiller]

lol man. How many times will you say the same thing ? I have said so many times that, it is not the reason for me voting to you. And you somehow ignore everything else and focus only on that because it is convenient to you.

For all the readers, please see posts 155, 158, 179, 184, 199, 213 (recent one) for my reasons on why I voted for CK.

I cannot explain more than this and I rest my case.

My lynch stays.

Coming to zwarrior, his reason for targeting me is that i didn't realise that it's possible that there is a pro-Town Vigilante before reading his post. The truth is, i didn't pay attention to some of the posts before his (some). He is lynching me on purely hypothetical grounds.

 

[RUDI]

Still waiting for an explanation.
Btw, Rudolph roleclaimed to be a roleblocker and to have blocked Simon, how come no one has adressed that?

Address it then. You are not acting in the best interest of this site ^

 

[asprin]

Btw, Rudolph roleclaimed to be a roleblocker and to have blocked Simon, how come no one has adressed that?

That's the only reason why I haven't lynched anyone yet. I'm waiting to hear from him.

 

[zwarrior]

No, he is targeting you because your reason of being busy as a result of a test match in play was found to be false by him.

Exactly.

And look at the above post. Again he is telling that my reason for voting to him is that - "he didn't pay attention to some of my posts". What am I ? An attention seeker who wants everyone to see my posts ?

He is ignoring my main reason and focusing on other things from the very beginning.

 

[AliB]

Exactly.

And look at the above post. Again he is telling that my reason for voting to him is that - "he didn't pay attention to some of my posts". What am I ? An attention seeker who wants everyone to see my posts ?

He is ignoring my main reason and focusing on other things from the very beginning.

z has a point. I see CerealKiller has been trapped in front by Jack Ryder and have been given out and DRS clarifies it.

Lybnch: CerealKiller

 

[CerealKiller]

No, he is targeting you because your reason of being busy as a result of a test match was found to be false by him.

Exactly.

And look at the above post. Again he is telling that my reason for voting to him is that - "he didn't pay attention to some of my posts". What am I ? An attention seeker who wants everyone to see my posts ?

He is ignoring my main reason and focusing on other things from the very beginning.

Ok, i'll admit that it wasn't because of the match. I simply didn't pay attention to the posts. I only saw Jack's first post, and his subsequent follow ups.
Even if i lied about the match, your reason for lynching me has no connection to being scum. Even if i'm lying about the reason why i think the setup is how i think it is, how does that make me scum? I mean, it's a hypothetical setup.

 

[Gaurav_7]

Vote count:

CerealKiller (4) - zwarrior, Jack Ryder, Rudolph, AliB
Rudolph (1) - Simon
zwarrior (1) - CerealKiller

Not voting (2) - Perfect Square, asprin

With 8 alive, it takes 5 for a majority.

 

[zwarrior]

i'll admit that it wasn't because of the match

Even if i lied about the match, your reason for lynching me has no connection to being scum

Even if I lied about the match ? lol. You just admitted above that you lied about the match thing and in the next line you are telling "Even if I lied about the match". How did 'if' come here ? In first sentence you admitted that you lied.

Even if i'm lying about the reason why i think the setup is how i think it is, how does that make me scum?

Again. I never said that the reason is - " because of how you think the setup is" . How many times do I have to repeat the reason ????????

 

[CerealKiller]

Even if I lied about the match ? lol. You just admitted above that you lied about the match thing and in the next line you are telling "Even if I lied about the match". How did 'if' come here ? In first sentence you admitted that you lied.

FFS, i did lie about the match, and i wasn't denying it in the second sentence.

your reason for lynching me has no connection to being scum

Response to this? ^

 

[asprin]

Ok, i'll admit that it wasn't because of the match. I simply didn't pay attention to the posts. I only saw Jack's first post, and his subsequent follow ups.
Even if i lied about the match, your reason for lynching me has no connection to being scum. Even if i'm lying about the reason why i think the setup is how i think it is, how does that make me scum? I mean, it's a hypothetical setup.

I'm sorry buddy. If you get lynched or nightkilled today (assuming you're town and the mafia would want a target for tonight), you've yourself to blame here. In a game of mafia, once you admit to lying, there is no coming back from it. As it is, the trust level in a mafia game is always at its lowest.[DOUBLEPOST=1494851465][/DOUBLEPOST]If you're town, the mafia have a juicy target for tonight. If you're mafia, then I don't know...

 

[CerealKiller]

I'm sorry buddy. If you get lynched or nightkilled today (assuming you're town and the mafia would want a target for tonight), you've yourself to blame here. In a game of mafia, once you admit to lying, there is no coming back from it. As it is, the trust level in a mafia game is always at its lowest.

How can you not see that zwarrior is targeting me arbitrarily? I mean, he is literally nitpicking single words out of my posts.

 

[asprin]

How can you not see that zwarrior is targeting me arbitrarily? I mean, he is literally nitpicking single words out of my posts.

Not the point I was trying to make. You slipped up. If zwarrior is mafia, he will obviously play on that. What I was getting at is that you should have made a post in this thread only after making sure you have evidence to back up your claims.