^Well 4 quicks is ideal for us, but if the wicket looks rough and you Pommies play 2 spinners, I think Hauritz should play (well I hope he does). With a bit of assistance he can be handy enough and would make our over rate troubles disappear. And if 3 quicks aren't good enough, would 4 make all the difference? Anyway...But it would be important to supplement Haury's potential selection with Watson/McDonald at #6 (#7 for Ronnie), just to give a better bowling option than North if Hauritz gets some tap.
But it wil create a bit of a selection mess if Hauritz is picked because then Lee/Clark will miss out. If Clark misses out, then McDonald might be in with a shot as the all-rounder as a Johnson/Siddle/Lee attack does not look like a very economical one. Ronnie is Mr Economy for us. But if it's Lee who misses out, then Watson would likely be ahead in the all-rounder stakes.
Or you could pick Hilfenhaus who is better at keeping it quiet than Lee and can actually swing it unlike Clark. He is not a better bowler than either of them IMO, but he may be a better fit balance wise for the attack along with Mitch and Siddle if we only play 3 quickies, since Mitch and Siddle are 2 aggressive quicks who can leak runs and aren't reliable swingers of the ball. Hilfy would be the ideal foil for those 2.
So many options it makes my head hurt, but in a way, I'm pretty confident whoever we end up picking.