why bowlers to batsman, not the other way around?

Lassana Dias

Club Cricketer
Joined
Jan 7, 2011
Location
Sri Lanka
Online Cricket Games Owned
Why do you think, players who start out as bowlers become world class batsman who hardly bowl –

Examples – Sanath, Ravi rathnayaka, Thilan samaraweera, shohib malik (and many more)

But batsman never become specialist bowlers who bats down the order


what do you think?
 
Mark Richardson as well, Aaron Redmond as examples from NZ. Kevin Pietersen is another good example.

For Richardson it was a case of the yips.
 
That is one mystery in cricket !!! I cant even think of one player who became a bowler from being a batsman

----------

Mark Richardson as well, Aaron Redmond as examples from NZ. Kevin Pietersen is another good example.

For Richardson it was a case of the yips.

will give you another one from NZ, James Franklin, he was a very good bowler who bats 10-9. and now he hardy bowl he's friendy slow stuff and bats 4-5 :facepalm
 
That was because of injury. While injured, he wasn't able to bowl so he worked hard on his batting

He still bowls quite a bit domestically, and is really successful, but it's not the sort of bowling that earns wickets at the higher level.
 
That was because of injury. While injured, he wasn't able to bowl so he worked hard on his batting

He still bowls quite a bit domestically, and is really successful, but it's not the sort of bowling that earns wickets at the higher level.

But you mentioned Mark Richardson as well, as far as I know he started as an opening batsman and finished as the same. Did he bowl? :eek:

same for Aaron Redmond, nothing changed?
 
Last edited:
He used to bowl slow left armers and was pretty good but got the yips and turned himself into an incredibly defensive opening batsman

----------

I believe Redmond started out as a specialist leg spinner, but he wasn't too successful at that and so he started working on his batting
 
What about Sir Garfield Sobers. He was a batsman first and then started to bowl as far as I know?
 
He used to bowl slow left armers and was pretty good but got the yips and turned himself into an incredibly defensive opening batsman

that must be before becoming a test crickter, and that also 44 wickets only of 157 matches ( don?t worry dude, my source is cricinfo now :lol )

----------

What about Sir Garfield Sobers. He was a batsman first and then started to bowl as far as I know?

bro but he never lots he's batting did he? infact he got better
 
Yep, I think it's quite rare once you're on the international scene to undergo such a dramatic transformation in your game.
 
Bowling requires more skill tbh, at least at international level and I suppose everyone has to bat which is why there are more good batsman. Plus batters are lazy, and most bowlers that turn into batters are lazy as well. Can't be bothered putting in the hard yards at fitness training. I'm a fast bowler so maybe I'm a bit biased :p
 
Sobers was selected a bowler first too, incidentally.


The thing is that batting is something that you can be good at even without a lot of natural flair or technique, through constant practice and with solid concentration. Experience plays quite a large role too, there are so many batsmen out there without the best technique who are able to put up big scores through simple grind, concentration, and knowing what shots to play and when.

Bowling on the other hand is something which is harder to pick up later on - a bowling action is after all more un-natural that thwacking a ball with a bat. You usually need to start bowling from a young age to be able to do it to any degree of competency when older. It also takes a lot more practice to develop the accuracy and variations needed at the higher level, it's less about experience than batting; and more about constant practicing of skills and fine-tuning the bowling action.

It is also more strenuous on the body than batting, which is why many allrounders give up bowling as they get older and focus on their batting.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top