Cricketman
ICC Chairman
- Joined
- Jul 27, 2005
- Location
- USA
It doesn't matter if the ball would've hit the stumps or not. His gloves were in front of the stumps and that's a no ball. End of.
Brad Haddin - Cheat?
- Thread starter irottev
- Start date
mattfb
Chairman of Selectors
Then it's the umpires fault.
Harrypotter_fan
Panel of Selectors
So Haddin knew he got the bails with his gloves but still celebrates is completely innocent? And on top of it he asks Vettori to apologize.
mattfb
Chairman of Selectors
Like I said earlier, you can't be sure what impact was first, and when the impact was when your pulling your gloves from in front of the stumps to behind in less then a second.
Harrypotter_fan
Panel of Selectors
You mean we can't be sure or Haddin can't be sure?
mattfb
Chairman of Selectors
Haddin can't be.
Harrypotter_fan
Panel of Selectors
Then why the guilty expression?
mattfb
Chairman of Selectors
Like I've also said he could have been thinking about it.
Harrypotter_fan
Panel of Selectors
New Zealand and Australia are fine with it. So why are we arguing? 
Leggie
Chairman of Selectors
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2007
- Online Cricket Games Owned
Haddin could have shown a bit of sportsmanship...But I guess not.
angryangy
ICC Chairman
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2004
I can lock the thread if it will give you peace of mind.
Cricketman
ICC Chairman
- Joined
- Jul 27, 2005
- Location
- USA
Lol.
If he asks someone to apologize after seeing the replays and all that he is either blind or a cheat. take your pick
If he asks someone to apologize after seeing the replays and all that he is either blind or a cheat. take your pick
mattfb
Chairman of Selectors
That's the thing, he's asking Vettori to apologize for calling him a cheat because he didn't think he did at the time so its unfair.
:
That's the thing, he's asking Vettori to apologize for calling him a cheat because he didn't think he did at the time so its unfair.
But Vettori didn't call him a cheat.
Similar threads
