AkshayS
Chairman of Selectors
Yeah, that is the better one and didn't run for ages like the other one.
I really didn't like Murali's, Tendulkar's was the best.
I really didn't like Murali's, Tendulkar's was the best.
I do not think that the ICC would repeat the follies of 2007. You may have a few matches being played in front of empty stadiums, but rest be assured that matches involving the sub-continental teams will be played in front of full houses.
As for the stadiums- Yes, the Mumbai and Kolkata stadiums are behind schedule. Don't think it should hamper the WC as each is authorized to host only 3 games. Kolkata isn't hosting any high profile games this time round. Mumbai, will be ready in time for the final.
Regarding stadiums, I dunno why Hyderabad has not been taken into consideration, with a top class pitch available (The pitch acts same for both the innings), and a new stadium, whereas brand brand new stadiums like Pallakele, Hambantota (from Sri Lanka) have been considered without their constructions done. At least, two games (One of India) could have made many people happy! Seriously, I dunno why Hyderabad was neglected!
I wanted to open a new thread on this, but I thought I should just ask it here.
Do you guys think ICC should change the roster rule and extend it to at least 20 member? I mean how can teams survive with only 4 extra player? I think 20 is more balanced number.
OMG! when and where!Political situation. People out there are fighting for a separate state. I don't think that they would stop for the World Cup.
I think boards should start taking more players during the series.
OMG! when and where!
Everything was set right, right before IPL 2010. IPL, just cause of politics of Modi, couldn't get back!
This is absolute politics. Just showing a reason to skip matches off Hyderabad!
96:AUS vs SL
99:Aus vs Pak
03:Aus vs Ind
07:Aus vs SL
11:Aus vs Pak
15:Aus vs Ind
and the story continues................