I shall be disappointed if you don't have another one keep wicket nowI've got one Richards, so I'll take another
I’m planning someone with the same first name…I shall be disappointed if you don't have another one keep wicket now
You know it.
Well, if @Aislabie wants to talk wicketkeepers then I'll take Jeff Dujon. Kept to arguably the quickest bowlers of any generation, and as he'll tell you...he still managed to have five stumpings. I always pick keepers on their glovework first and he's probably one of the best of the lot. Flamboyant? Undoubtedly so. But effective? Oh, hell yes. Acrobatic, a large range of coverage. You almost didn't need a first slip, he'd pouch anything. Never been a part of a losing series. For someone who played 81 Tests that's an impressive feat. Played against Gower as well so directly related.
I never saw him play, I'm not that old, but my dad rates him as the best wicketkeeper-batsman he's ever seen.
@sanchitgarg
Hello mate unless I missed it you have a late pick from the prior round tooMy pick would be Adam Gilchrist.
@Yash.
Sorry, my bad.Hello mate unless I missed it you have a late pick from the prior round too
Sorry, my mistake. I am not sure if Clyde Walcott is eligible or not, so I'll rather pick Rahul Dravid who is definitely eligible as he played with Sachin Tendulkar. He will play at 3 for my team and will provide solidity to the middle order.The way you've worded this is confusing. If Garry Sobers didn't play with or against Gower, then Walcott is ineligible.
Played with or against Gower = 1 degree of separation.
Played with or against someone who played with or against Gower = 2 degrees of separation.
Can you confirm?
You know it.
Post automatically merged:
there’s a keeper most of the WI bowlers will tell you was even better, but he couldn’t stay off the pot.